Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
Neo-satanism
The merits of a tune
Most Australians would agree with Briggs when he states that change does not come from being comfortable. However, most Australian would also agree that forced changes are only to be implemented for the better otherwise the change is nothing more than a downgrade.
The current Australian infrastructures and systems in place have been designed predominantly by English. For several decades our infrastructures have been heavily neglected and our systems have been steered into socialism. Regardless, they are still managing to hold Australia together, allowing it to function as a first world nation – a testament to the strength and resilience of the English social and economic architectures.
For several past decades, the Aboriginal peoples have been given support from Australia financially, culturally and territorially. You have been given ample opportunity to implement your own systems and infrastructures. However, your communities have, for the most part, only spiralled downwards and backwards. The towns where aborigines are concentrated have much higher criminal, paedophilia, rape, incest, drug and alcohol abuse, incarceration, suicide, murder and unemployment rates than the national averages. But instead of owning and addressing these issues, seeking help and advice to try to come up with solutions, you demand more money and assets whilst shifting the blame on to white Australians, using political correctness as a shield to censor statistics and counter-arguments. We are now at the point where you are no longer satisfied in having the freedom of showcasing your own flag or the freedom of creating your own anthem, you also desecrate and demand the removal of our symbols, our anthem and our heritage. You use reparation to conceal an agenda of vendetta.
I do not deny that in the past there were instances where Aborigines were treated in an inhumane manner, the removal of Aborigine children from their parents being the prime example, but I cannot help wonder as to why this was implemented. Perhaps they, too, saw atrocities committed against the Aborigine youths at the hands of their own parents, as we see it today. Perhaps they, too, witnessed abnormally high levels criminality, paedophilia, rape, incest, murder, suicide and alcohol abuse within the Aboriginal communities. Perhaps the urgency of the matter led them to act in haste without considering the long term repercussions. I think further historically investigation is warranted.
Before you point your finger and screech racism, I’ll remind you that Hong Kong was also under British administration at the time, yet the British did not opt to confiscate children from the Hong Kong-Chinese. I’ll also remind you that Hong Kong is now in the hands of their own kind, yet it is being oppressed by greedy, corrupt rulers. What guarantee can you give to non-Aborigine Australians that your leaders/representatives will not sell out their people if one of your very own has selfishly contracted out the Aboriginal flag for his personal gain? What guarantee do you have that others of your own won’t contract your lands and resources for their personal gain? The treasonous behaviour of a few could place the whole of Australia in peril, geopolitically and economically, not just the Aborigines.
And have you ever considered that if England had not conquered Australia it is very likely that today Aborigines would be living as inferiors in a Sharia province of Indonesia, with no say and certainly no financial benefits? Need only look at Western New Guinea and Tibet to understand Oriental colonialisation.
Briggs, 35 years is indeed a substantial time for a young nation such as Australia, so unless you come up with a melodious, multi-layered complex symphony of the likes of Alexander Alexandrov’s Russian Anthem, then we’re not changing anything. Let’s face it, your music sucks, it relies on rhythm rather than melody, lacking the necessary complex layering to handle an anthem. Besides, with the current global political climate, it would extremely unwise to change anything in the Australian constitution, the flag or the anthem.
We’re not changing the Australian anthem. Deal with it.
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
When age follows fashion
Queen’s Birthday
Having the good fortune to have been born in mid-June has given me the privilege of getting a day off to celebrate my own birthday, as well as that of the Queen. A nice perk, by all means, but it has also served to remind me of my heritage, my history and my connection to England. Today, on the Queen’s 93rd birthday, I reflect upon my life, as we all do on our birthdays, and I whisper to myself, “I am proud to be an Australian. I appreciate my English heritage. And I am honoured to share my birthday with a historical living symbol.”
Long live the Queen and may God bestow us with 100 more birthdays!
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
Reverse parking
Freedom of chess
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
Freedoms for me but not for thee
If we’d built a more civically minded culture we would not be having debates about, say, whether Julian Assange is a nice guy, or whether what he does is responsible journalism. We would instead be asking whether the basic elements of the crime he’s alleged to have committed against America – encouraging a whistleblower to disclose classified information – are the same basic elements of so much investigative journalism. The point is not Julian Assange. The point is the way the crime is framed – not the alleged criminal, but the things being criminalised. Just as the point is not whether the person being raided is a journalist or a citizen, but the extent to which those powers are ripe for abuse. If the only freedom you care about is freedom of the press, soon enough that will fold too because you’ve created a culture that’s insensitive to civic ideals.
Waleed Aly, Sydney Morning Herald 06.06.2019
As a stand-alone paragraph, the above has been constructed in a chaotic style. Please permit me to restate your oddly convoluted reasoning:
1. “Civically minded” cultures would not be debating Assange’s winning personality and ethics.
2. “Civically minded” cultures would be debating whether whistleblowing encouragement is the equivalent of investigative journalism.
3. Julian Assange is only a symbol being used to further the loss of journalistic rights narrative.
4. The Assange narrative is false and it sucks and it’s dangerous.
5. Such a narrative leads to abuse of power.
6. Freedom of the press is only as good as its culture.
That’s better, I feel more intellectually organised, now. Let me respond.
1. Civilised cultures inhabited with civilised people would not need to debate the infringements which 18c imposes.
2. Civilised cultures would be debating whether freedom of speech infringements are the equivalent of inferior cultures’ censorship and what that type of censorship leads to, ie, a throw-back.
3. 18c is only a symbol and it’s only a baby step to further the loss of rights narrative.
4. The multicultural narrative on freedom of speech is false and it sucks and it’s dangerous.
5. This fake narrative will lead to abuse of power.
6. Freedom of speech is only as good as its culture.
One peel leads to another peel. It’s like an onion. So when MSM cry but muh journalistic rights, I can’t say that I am surprised and you cannot deny that you weren’t warned. Yet, to this day, you stand by the 18c freedom of speech narrative.
I have not seen any comments on whether Julian Assange is nice or not, but I’ll grant you that that could be due to our very different reading and researching diets. I have, however, seen on the ABC (your mates), the Most Holy Father Peter Greste stating that journalistic protections ought to be reserved only for a select few and that Julian Assange was not included in the club.
I could, at this point, sit here and describe the glee and joy I am currently feeling, but I shan’t. Well, maybe just a little.
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
Ménage à Coup
Don’t let them eat MY cake!
ABC News 24.05.2019
ABC News presenter of no consequence:
Can I just summarise how I understand the professor Peter Greste University which is that on one side there are journalists and newsgathering organisations that go through data and try to interpret it and try to make it relevant for people and try to make it do as little harm as possible when it comes out. And on the other side, there are whistleblowers who are at the coalface, who are breaking the law, who deserve better protection for whistleblowing bad things going on. But in the middle, there is a vacuous nebulous, grey area where a person like is Assange, who is not actually a whistleblower, and he’s not actually a journalist, he’s just someone who dumps information.
Never heard of him Prof Peter Greste, University of Queensland:
That’s right, and that’s what the digital world has done for us, it has created this very difficult space where anybody with a website can call themselves a publisher, that doesn’t mean that I think that anybody with a website deserves the kind of protections and deserves to be called a journalist and deserves press freedom protections.
Delusional moments of mutual masturbatory exchanges from the authoritarian extremist left are becoming a staple in the West. A recent exchange of the sort took place on the ABC news yesterday, where a lesser news presenter facilitated a teacher of journalism to conspire, live, as to why the competition needs to be eliminated. The presenter even went so far as to employ the oldest journalistic psyop trick in the book of summarising and reiterating the interview, in his own words, so that the viewers who fell asleep or used the opportunity to take a toilet break would not miss out on the vitally important message. What agent 86 and 99 don’t realise is that their thinly veiled un-journalist techniques, on the rare occasion that people actually note them, only achieve to anger mentally healthy Australian.
I would love to counter argue the fellatio-exchange of these two men, but I find myself unable to do so because they did not provide any arguments. The prof did nothing by whine, stating that only the MSM journalists had the right to be journalists. So, now I find myself forced to counter-argue a whinge, not an argument. But I’m always up for the challenge.
1. The teach’ is a classist snob supporting MSM media privilege by stating or implying that the alternate media is immoral, unprincipled and should all be locked up.
2. The teach’ interpretation of the world and the people who occupy it, and his push to jail Assange and other alternative media is conspiratorial in nature. At best.
3. The teach’ peddled MSM journalistic entitlement which was anti-free speech, undemocratic and anti-competitive.
4. The teach’ is unwilling to allow journalism to evolve into a merit-based system. He’s a dinosaur.
5. The teach’ used fear speech to justify the MSM media appropriation of information and narratives.
I really wanted to play debate this evening but the teach’ has forced me to attack his sneaky tactics instead of his ideas. I wanted to play fair, but the game is rigged so I am left with no other choice.
Time to learn to code, teach’.
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
The Zeta
Most of us are familiar with Alpha, Beta, Gamma personalities; however, there is a minor personality type which is rarely discussed but which fascinates me to end – the Zeta. It’s a rare personality for a very good reason, as it a destructive force to an established hierarchy.
Although I would love to blame today’s corporatist and socialist built hierarchies in having created structures which filter out such a personality from the system, the system is simply not that clever nor does it possess that level of self-awareness. It, like you and I, is merely acting in accordance with the rules of survival, so it hones onto the Zeta, preventing him from entering and infecting the system.
By now I’m guessing you’re scratching your head and wondering what is a Zeta and how can an individual be this destructive to an establishment. The short answers: it’s a human weapon and yes, they have the ability to overturn and destroy an establishment, it comes naturally to them.
Most of the Zeta definitions I have seen online have been created by people who identify as Sigmas, this has contaminated the definition, often trying to “promote” the Zeta into a pseudo-Sigma or “denigrate” him into a pseudo-alpha. The truth is, Zetas are a separate identity with specific abilities and with very different motivations.
To understand the Zeta it is helpful to compare his traits to the other two dominant personalities – the Alpha and Sigma. If the Alpha is energised by his group, and the Sigma is energised by the individual, the Zeta is energised by dislodging an establishment. When the Zeta infiltrates a hierarchy, he sits to the side and studies the group, their motivations, their dynamics, their routines looking for weaknesses and methods to initially take it down and then to improve the system. As the Zeta doesn’t necessarily seek power (unless power is necessary to execute the take-down), he has an iron focus and patience needed for his analysis. So, he will happily sit in the shadows, for extended periods of time, always examining and pondering, before moving in to pull threads and strike bolts.
Moreover, Zetas gain an enormous amount of pleasure and fulfilment in dismantling and overhauling a hierarchy. To a collective that has been occupied by nefarious forces, the Zeta becomes their saviour. They are the emergency kit to a failing culture or the liberating force that re-routes a culture.
A similar personality is Super-Empath. He, in the right circumstances, behaves like a micro-Zeta, where instead of taking down a hierarchy he focuses on taking down an individual or group. The SE, like the Zeta, is a human data collector which activates into destruction mode only when his spirit is threatened. And like the observant Zeta, when the SE shoots he does not miss. He knows and understands too much.
This begs the question as to whether Zeta personalities can also be Super Empaths. Although both personalities types are rare, the probability that two coincide is conceivable. There is some evidence that Catherine the Great exhibited both.
The West, and thus the world, is at a crossroad which must be taken. Since the evolution of democracy of Ancient Greece, we have, yet again, the opportunity to achieve true democracy on a global scale. The internet is pushing for it with such a speed that governments are finding it impossible to curtail it, even with the aid of their anti-democratic engineered systems in place. The time which benefits the few at the cost of the many is drawing to a close. We entering the era of the Zetas, as only they have the power to blow up the system, overhaul it and facilitate this all-important transition. Zetas, come forth!
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
Sail
A Royal Flush
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
Dr Kemper and Mr Mummy
Corporate adjustments
In a buried life, I used to be in the field of administration. I taught myself everything there is to know about it, well, everything that benefited me. I learned how to stroke egos to gain job contracts and how to allow them to spare me the chore of rejecting job contracts. I learned how to ask for the maximum and deliver the minimum. I learned detachment, compartmentalisation, inconsistency and not giving a toss. I learned to play the corporate game. I learned to weave through their crawlspaces. I learned sociopathy.
It would extremely naïve to assume that corporate crawlspaces have been designed just to filter through sociopaths, narcissists and opportunists. The architects designed these systems to primarily allow corporatists the opportunity to operate illegally, immorally and subversively, whilst appearing to wash their hands. Silicone breast prosthesis prices in Australia is such an example. Pensioners and benefits recipients who have had mastectomies are allowed to claim the full reimbursement for silicone prosthesis of up to $900, so the corporatists have adapted their profit margin by inflating the price from $100-$150 (in other countries) to exactly $900 (in Australia). Not a peep from our sociopathic politicians or our narcissistic media.
Another more shocking example is how the corporate world took advantage of the tax threshold when it was raised from $6,000 to $18,000. Right on cue, the corporatists crawled through their basement spaces and manipulate this little monetary power that the government handed to the working class, to their raise their profits. That very year, I noticed that the number of jobs which offered my preferred pay range had dropped significantly, whilst the lower bracket salary ranges had become a lot more populated. The corporate job market, at least in the administration recruitment section, appropriated the little extra cash that the tax-free threshold allowed workers to keep and tabulated it as part of their new salary packages. To this date, the administration salary sector in Sydney has still not completely recovered from this immoral behaviour. Nor has it ever been picked up by any Main Stream Manure reporter.
The Australian election 2019, however, has delved right into the corporatists’ crawlspaces via the Labor party – it wants to subsidise child care workers salaries’ by 20%. I’m going to put aside the absurdity of forcing workers to pay for other people’s children’s babysitting so that the mothers can work and the fact that this is an initial step for a State-controlled and distributed salary system, aka communism and deal just with the consequences on the job markets’ salaries. Here’s my learned corporate sociopath prediction: the corporatists will adjust to this State salary hike by lowering all future salary packages by 20% (or more)! Let’s be honest, they’d have to be idiots not to take up such a sweet deal.
Rape culture foresight
First, rape.
Second, conceal.
Third, joke about it.
Last, the moment where the realisation hits that having an extra mutant-eye doesn’t alleviate a blind spot.
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
Sweeter than honey
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
Questionable answers
“So, this is a question to both of you. Mr Morrison what do you admire about Mr Shorten. And Mr Shorten, what do you admire about Mr Morrison?” The brunette chick in brown.
Please allow Ms The-Art-of-Flag-waving to set the record straight, as both gentlemen were faking empathy and benevolence, sucking up to voters. I admire absolutely nothing in both men.
Neither cucked politician has anything to offer to Australians. Morrison is a soft socialist corporatist who is happy to sell out Australia’s freedom of speech so to become the ultimate right-wing virtue signaller. He marches around like the Ever-ready Energizer bunny, repeatedly beating his little censorship drum without any rhythmic variation, without melody and certainly without style. A try-hard who has inverted his braggadocio predisposition to emulate humility, as he lacks the emotional depth to fake it for real.
Ssshorten, a socialist-communist, is also selling out the Australian culture and resources to the highest bidder, as he ssslithers around like a sssnake …sssliding, twisssting and turning on the ground, between the bussshesss, looking for fresh, young soulsss to devour. Yet another talentless, try-hard phony who has inverted his licentiousness to emulate morals and kindness, as he is completely devoid of either virtue.
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
Negative charisma, a polical diversion tactic
The 2019 election is turning out to be the boring election in Australia I have yet to see. Bill 2.0 and Lemon King are both guilty of charisma bigotry, opting to put us all to deep sleep. Don’t let this tactic fool you, the dull façade is carefully planned and executed to make their nonsense and policies as exclusive as possible with the hope that no one will notice their lies and their ever-growing Chicom sponsored socialist reforms.
Let’s take a quick look at what our duopoly is up to thus far in this riveting battle of lacklustre traitors…
King Lemon Scomo
ABC’s abruptly zooms out of Lemon King’s face to tone down his panting and his chicom corporatist enthusiasm.
This is what the economy looks like. <spin>
The economy is people. <spin>
People want the economy to work. <spin> + <idiotic asymmetrical grin>
Working the economy is what the liberal party does. <weeeee>
We liberals love the economy. <I’m getting dizzy>
Keeping our budget bubble strong is how we secure seats. <spin>
Liberals understand the economy and the little Aussie battler. <spin>
They are both bubbles. <spin>
The economy is a bubble. <tail caught in the mouth for a brief moment>
Australia is a bubble. <spin>
I’m a bubble. <spin>
The Chinese spies who sponsor my economy loving party are a bubble. <double spin>
Mr. Speaker is a bubble. <asinine asymmetrical grin>
Stop asking the economy loving party bubble question. <nearly caught tail again>
It has taken 5 years of bubbling for the liberals to come up with the bubble budget. <hee-haw>
Thank you very much. <flicks his tail, spins off with lemon in mouth>
Rapey Bill 2.0
ABC’s slowly and dramatically zooms into Bill Spiritless’ face to reanimate his red-tinged messages.
I want to take real action to climate change and renewable energy and push energy prices down. <pause – one thousand, two thousand> + <tilt head slightly to the left> + <puss in the boots eyes> We’ll get on top of living burdens and get wages moving again by getting everyone to buy electric cars <mini-pause, one thousand> + <eyebrow lift> in the interest of middle-class people who are stuck in the past. <extra long pause – one thousand, two thousand, three thousand> My team is united in fighting for the Green’s agenda. <one thousand, two thousand> + < quizzical expression> When all these things work together the Greens and Labor are going to make the economy hum. <benevolent eyebrow knitting> Jobs, jobs, and more fictional jobs will bloom through my deindustrialisation of Australia tax policies. <one thousand, two thousand> + < Virtue signalling eyebrow knotting> Wages, wages and more wages by turning Australia into an impoverished socialist welfare State. <One thousand, two thousand> Vagina, vagina and more vagina to satisfy my sexual compulsions. <One thousand, two thousand, three thousand, four thousand, five thousand> Thank you, everybody. See you on the trail.
Australia has two choices, a) Boring & treasonous through stupidity and b) Boring & treasonous through determination. Which 
will you be voting for?
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
The C word
On this crisp autumn evening, The Drum had the gall to ridiculeAustralians by implying that both major parties are about to “effe” Aussies. With a gloating grin stretching from ear to ear, Fanning (another eFFer) stated, “Well it’s show time, and it is all about the F word… ”
Although I appreciate ABC’s Frankness to finally reveal the Federal government’s agenda, I beg to disagree, this show is all about the C word.
Scott Morrison’s all about the C word – a Corporatist lemon parturition.
Bill Shorten’s about the C word – a Communist national abduction and rape.
And there are plenty of other C words the coalition and Labor equally share amongst each other – Corruption, Compromised, Cucks and China, being some. At this election show pollies your support by waving a C with your index and thumb. They deserve no less.
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
Australian Budget 2019 – a voter friendly summary
ABC, the new age scoundrel
Hi ABC.
On this occasion, I’ll let the Australian people speak for me. I’ll only add one little thing: extreme regulating has become the new refuge for scoundrels.
A submissive misanthrope
“…Love for all hatred for none (x2), which I believe are words which should be embraced by all in this time and age. We are a community who also know very well that hate speech can result in innocent lives being taken just as we have witnessed in the Christchurch attack. As a hijab-wearing Muslim, I am fearful of what is to come especially as such hate has already come from certain leaders. To prevent any future targeted attacks which arise from online hate speech and brainwashing, my question to the panel is how free should free speech be in Australia and how can we target the hatemongering, where is the balance?’ Rabia Shariff.
My Dear Rabia
I realise you have been selected to ask a fake and weaponised question to a fake and weaponised panel of traitors and dingbats and that your question has probably been fine-tuned by people who want to take down my culture, but hey, I’ll play.
“Your” question is based on a faulty definition of free speech and understanding of Western culture. Your correlation between hate speech being the cause for massacres is an unsubstantiated opinion. Furthermore, your failure to understand how fundamental free speech is to Western culture is a clear indication that you have failed to integrate into my culture.
Islam, just these past few days has sponsored a 3-year sting operation in an attempt to take down an Australian conservative party just prior to an election – this is an act of political aggression, not peace. Islam, just these past few days, has also threatened any Australian wanting to visit Gallipoli and pay their respect to our WW1 soldiers, this is an act of aggression, not peace. And you have the gall to state that your religion of misanthropy comes in peace and imply that we need to curb our right to freedom of speech to accommodate your destructive religion!?
What has made the West into the greatest culture in the world is our ability to divorce passion from reason. What has reduced Islamic nations into violent, zealot spiralling squalors is their inability to divorce passion from reason. It is precisely this difference which makes Islam more incompatible to the West than all the other non-western cultures put together.
For decades Westerns have had no choice but follow our corrupt governments’ agenda (both left leaning and right leaning). They, and the MSM, have consistently showered us with multiculturalism propaganda and created the false illusion that Westerns were complicit and impotent, but then came the internet and the voices of the many is being restored.
As a result, the MSM and the governments are in panic mode. They are afraid of being dethroned, they are afraid of landing in jail for treason, they are afraid of a revolt. So they do the only thing they can do, default to censor freedom of speech using the law and micromanage our every movement, in a pathetic, delusion attempt to create a synthetic state of peace.
As a Western woman with Christian foundations, I am not submitted into wearing head coverings or endure sexual mutilation to prove my morality or my worth. I enjoy my freedom, my equal status, my culture, my ability to speak my mind. Freedom of speech must be restored in Australia and hate speech laws scrapped, as they are nothing more than a control tool. Australia can only solve its terrorist attacks by banning all Islamic immigration, stripping criminal’s citizenships, outlaw Islamic costumery and shutting down Mosques which only serve to recruit and groom extremists. Hate mongering, subversive cultural manipulation and the endless stream of Islamic terrorist attacks that have occurred on Australian soil due to the religion of misanthropy shall be resolved once and for all.
A society dictated by loons – the Marxist social engineers’ control mechanism
Currently, in the West, there is only one thing that unites the left and the right – our inability to control our reactions to the collectivised mental disorders existing everywhere we look. These pathologies are affecting everyone, even those who choose to dig their heads in the sands. Narcissism is the most prevalent of all the disorder, which has exploded from 1% to nearly 7% in recent years.
There is no doubt that most of the blame rests upon the social engineers who have built the perfect infrastructure for this mental disorder to thrive. Single mothers, promiscuity, female supremacy, inferior supremacy, romanticising mental conditions, envy based redistribution of people’s wealth and other Marxist ideologies, have worked together to erode the West’s moral, social and religious core values which functioned to protect us from such an occurrence.
Whilst researching, I discovered that there does not exist a single deranged symptom within narcissism which is not expressed by politicians, SJWs, feminists, leftists, professors and other minorities. Every. Single. One. Below, I have made a quick table listing some of the most basic symptoms of narcissism and have given a simple and internet famous example to demonstrate the how these abnormal behaviours are expressed in our culture. However, as the symptom list is significantly longer than my list, I leave it up to the reader to research narcissism and think of other examples.
Symptoms of narcissism vs culture
Brenton Tarrant terrorism, cultural narcissism exposed
Now that the nature of narcissism has been set out, I shall explore a detailed example on how these disturbed people are endangering the West’s security and how they protect themselves from taking any responsibility.
In the West, cultural narcissists have become very adept at using devasting events to push their pathologies on to societies at large. One such event is the New Zealand mosque shooting. Jacinta Arden, New Zealand’s Prime Minister, went out of her way to use this massacre as a virtue signalling pageantry. Within hours of the shooting, Arden set the pace by initially declaring further limits to already limited gun laws.
She then proceeded into a full blown narcissism attack, using Islamic costume props and enacting exaggerated scenes of empathy. (Excessive displays of feelings and outrage are expressions of narcissism.) She carefully shifted blame from herself to the New Zealand population through sharing an Islamic pray hosted in the NZ parliament, generously showering victims’ families with tax payer’s money, sponsored state funerals and offered to pay for corpse transfers to any destination in the world. A stereotypical narcissist manipulative manoeuvre to reel in the scapegoats and then guilt trip them by deflecting the blame on to them .
Arden also rendered the killer nameless, making it easier for her to conceal her participation in the creation of a lethal cultural concoction. Another narcissistic distraction and deflection technique: by dehumanising the mass murderer it helped her seem more human – a vampire sucking life from an unscrupulous criminal.
So not to be outdone by the most efficient Auschwitzian terrorist operation in my lifetime, a noble delinquent physically assaulted a senator (from behind) and orchestrated Haka primitive war dances toddled on TV screens like flocks of wingless kiwi birds for days on end. Narcissistic compulsion to outcompete and exaggerated fake morals.
Right on cue, the virtuous ABC pulled out their reserve team of control freaks and Chinese sponsored communists, who I have never seen before and, luckily, very likely never to see again, all arrogantly singing in unison that the people don’t have the right to view streams, to share streams, to talk about streams, to mention anyone in streams, to identify people in streams, to think about streams and even dream about streams. Drunk on their delusions of control and having more than 6 geriatrics who regularly listen to their putrid vomit, they took it one step further by also stating that the killer must remain nameless, faceless, bodiless and raceless (but not sexless). In fact, all criminals must remain nameless, faceless, bodiless and raceless (but not sexless). What a convenient, cunning plan to aid their control over Australians, attempting to manipulate and dilute our ability to make crime and race connections, so to save their sorry arses.
Whilst Channel 10 got the ultimate communist narcissistic misanthrope to cry and virtue signal simultaneously, whilst ever so subtly throwing a threat in for good measure. Salt and kilij may indeed mix, diluted salt makes an excellent disinfectant. In case of injury, that is.
Channel 7, on the other hand, under the pretext of debate, boobytrapped into a corner another senator who did not agree with the narcissists’ narrative. They silenced her by not giving her any opportunity to respond through a coordinated and relentless misogynistic bullying. These two arseholes, one being an ex-MSM stooge and an alcoholic and the other a current MSM stooge and a vapid, quarrelsome eunuch, teamed their narcissism to also shift the blame on to Pauline Hansen. Scapegoating and deflection are classical narcissistic techniques of manipulation, and these two losers went full throttle – dehumanising, torturing and humiliating Pauline to feed their need to feel significant, impactful and special. Like Saint Magdalene Arden, this chauvinistic, disturbed duo coordinated a vicious attack so to distract viewers from considering their culpability to the Tarrant massacre.
This sleazy day time soapie production was then followed by the Australian government which decided to ban Milo from entering Australia (yet again) and which prompted another ABC intellectual brainstorm where they decided to override the constitution and ban all senators who resist their narcissistic narrative. Again, arrogance and delusions of importance are symptoms of narcissism.
Last night, Australian Telcos also joined the gang and decided to cut off Australia’s access to numerous news and discussion sites such as 4chan/pol and Zero Hedge. Welcome to China, folks.
Erdogan, like all Muslims, a loud-mouthed little tyrant who likes to milk violent Islamic sentiments through Muslim ignorance, took this opportunity to theorise a conspiracy reminiscent of a James Bond movie. After seeing that neither kindred-narcissist, Saint Magdalena Arden or Lemon-king Morrison, have the balls to do their jobs, Erdogan pushed his Islamic agenda further by inciting Islamic unrest within Australia with the hope to activate more jihadist massacres. The little tyrant threatened to kill Australians who visit the Turkish-shithole and also desecrated of our WWI heroes, who gave their lives so that we could be free. One would be forgiven to think that Lemon-king Morrison could have used this opportunity to redeem his uselessness, but Lemon-Loser Morrison delivered the usual submissive, virtue signalling, victimised narcissist response – a cowardly narcissist incapable to undertake the duty of a Prime Minister. This gutless, corrupt bag of compost needs to be tossed out asap, he poses a serious threat to Australia’s national security.
In the narcissist’s competitive mind, the issue they see here is not that Brentan Tarrant exterminated 50 misanthropes, rather, that he was better at killing than their pet misanthropes. Brentan Tarrant has raised the terrorist bar to new heights. He has propagandised the event like no other terrorist has ever done, one week in and the media and pollies are still discussing this event. He single headedly killed 50 and injured another 50 without getting a scratch on himself. He multitasked his killings between 2 mosques. He streamed a significant portion of his massacre. He has exposed the hypocrisy and totalitarianism of the left, the pollies and the media. And most importantly, he has managed to get significant support from the internet.
It sickens me to see that these narcissistic loons are motivated by envy. Yes, let that sink in – the left is envious of the efficiency and clever layers within this massacre. Their envy is pushing them to out-compete a mass killer in any which way they can – virtue signalling, scapegoating senators and the people, shifting blame, making threats, controlling the people through censorship and guilt tripping, arresting and threatening the people for nothing. If it weren’t so frightening it would be hilarious.
God bless the West and deliver us from these disturbed manipulators who are incapable of true love and empathy.
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
When a muslim preaches dignity…
If we still believe in some concept of inherent human dignity, it’s precisely at moments like this that it matters. In the same way that human rights matter most when we’re sorely tempted to dispense with them, human dignity becomes most meaningful when we’re tempted to strip it; when we’re confronted with those we think least deserve it; when we’re asked to give it to those who have done something terrible or even denied that dignity to others. That may not satisfy our anger. It might even leave us disappointed. But it’s in that very tension that we discover the difference between vengeance and justice.
Waleed Aly for the Age 15.03.2019
Hi Walee! I have one burning question to ask from a pro-Chirstian perspective to a pro-Muslim perspective …has your primary wife been “fixed”? Surely, there is no greater dignity for a woman.
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
The Art of Flag-waving 