WDPRM #2: A mole by the name of business man

The “What Do Politicians Really Mean,” WDPRM for short, is a quick interactive news translation for vote-newbies.

Today’s big news story :

“Domestic spy agency ASIO, which scrutinised the citizenship request, previously warned the Liberal, Labor and National parties about taking cash from Mr Huang Xiangmo, fearing he could try to advance Beijing’s interests.”

“The Government has always acted consistent with the advice that we’ve received and that’s what has happened on this occasion,” he [Scott Morrison] said.

Mr Morrison highlighted laws banning foreign donations that came into force on January 1.” ABC News 06.02.2019

Translation: The Liberals, Nationals and Labor both know how to play the game, beween the three of us we accepted $1 million dollars of official donations from this Chinese mole (unofficial donations are another matter). When ASIO gave us the heads-up that Huang Xiangmo’s citizenship will be stripped for espionage, we quickly implemented a fake law to cover our fat arses. Win/win.

“He said previous political donations had been accepted “in good faith”, based on information known at the time, suggesting the Liberal Party would not return any of Mr Huang’s contributions.” ABC News 06.02.2019

Translation: Meh, there are plenty of fish which swim in our oceans. And do you  really think that Asio’s recommendation was just a recommendation?   Wink.

 

Snapshot of well networked politicians and Mr Huang Xiangmo who refused to comment and/or the Fake Media refused to request a comment:

“I prefer Manolo Blahnik to Jimmy Choo.”

 

“Lucy Turnbull is my administrator.”

 

“I’m loving that red tie.”

 

“I have an honest face.”

 

“You look like my wife.”

 

Trend setters.

 

Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving

Advertisements

WDPRM #1: Happy Chinese new year, Australia! It’s the year of the swine.

The “What Do Politicians Really Mean,” WDPRM for short, is a quick interactive news translation for vote-newbies.

DancingPigThe pre WW1 dancing pig has been digitally remastered. Note the receding hairline, the sharp teeth, the Monalisa grin and the squinty eyes.

Last Friday Australia learnt that our Military is, in on likelihood, responsible for civilian deaths.
“Australian Defence officials have revealed two RAAF fighter jets were involved in a bombing mission in Iraq that led to the deaths of Iraqi civilians, with an Iraqi man whose family members were killed putting the civilian death toll at 35.” ABC, 01.02.2019

“Air Marshal Mel Hupfeld says reports Australian airstrikes killed civilians in Iraq are credible.”
“The responsibility to take lethal action in wartime is a heavy burden to carry,” Air Marshal Hupfeld told reporters in Canberra on Thursday.” TS Morning Herald, 10.02.2019

However…

OinkOink
Oink, oink.

Minister Scott Morrison described the deaths of up to 18 Iraqi civilians during the battle for Mosul as “difficult and tragic”.  ABC, 01.02.2019

Translation: Fake conspiratorial Trumpian news. It’s collateral damage, anyway. The pointless bloodshed must continue in spite of USA unwillingness to participate in warmongering.

But just when you thought the Labor party might actually give a toss and voice a different point of view…

Silent oink
Soft squeal. (Just so to make himself relevant.)

“Opposition leader Bill Shorten said he did not want to add additional pressure on ADF personnel. “If they’ve been investigated … I’m satisfied with that.” SMH, 01.02.2019

Translation: I’m not rocking the boat, my past sexual misconduct is being used as blackmail.

So there you have it folks. La crème de la crème of Australia politics.

 

Annabelle @ The Art of Waving-flaging

 

 

 

Breath in, engineered expansionism. Breath out, engineered compression. The elite’s blueprint.

 

If someone asked me to devise a strategy to take over a nation my feminine nature would opt for social engineering over a war. After all, subversion will always win over brute force, it’s the tortoise versus the rabbit match – slow, steady and insidious wins the race. And religion would be my choice carrier for my scheme. Why? Because I view religion as a living cultural manifesto – to own a society’s spirit is to own a society.

As a child, I had the ability to entertain myself for hours by studying people – their hair, their clothes, their features, their voices, their smiles and their demeanour. I was not interested in their verbal exchanges, because I instinctively sensed that words can be used to conceal objectives. I preferred to rely on non-verbal interactions. As an adult, I seek mental stimulation by scrutinizing cultures – their environments, their religions, their governments, their languages, their customs and their outlook. To this day, I prefer to rely on social intercourses over dialogues, as I am now certain that words conceal their radar resistant long-range missiles nature.

What superficially gives the impression to be an entertaining pass-time has, in actual fact, developed my understanding of humanity …and myself. It has allowed me to unearth the most important determining factor of a culture – its resources. A culture’s familial system, how it dresses, language, food, its laws, are all shaped and limited by a society’s (access to) resources. Culture is the biological fabric which clasps together a people and their resources, existing to create cohesion for the purpose of group survival.

Expansionistic Religions: propagation and conquest

The ultimate example of culture pushing aggressively outward would be Islam, a religion which evolved from resource impoverish territories lacking in water, fertile soils and usable energy. Survival in such a resource-depleted environment requires misanthropic and authoritarian foundations to enable the prioritisation of the system over its people. Contempt for life, distrust of mankind, strict rules and corporal punishment become the religion’s tools for cultural adherence.

Islam strives to survive through human expansionism. This migratory survival mechanism is driven by polygyny, as it concentrates access to women to the wealthiest minority of men. That is, the class of men who can afford to purchase dowries, maintain concubines and feed their children. It’s the perfect system to maintain maximum offspring survival rate limited only by a man’s wealth and virility. Their unlimited access to women also ensures that this lucre-class remain in their homelands to preserve the territory’s wealth and their breeding women. In effect, Islam function like a beehive factory – the queen remains in her hive, continuously laying eggs surrounded by its honey riches.

In sharp contrast, the queen-bee satiated men, the majority of the pinch-class men live in squalor, with no assets, without the comfort of female bonds and no way to express their heterosexual drive. These drone-bees are purposefully engineered to encourage migration (so to satiate their sexual drive) or to become fighters (to divert their sexual drives). In both instances, they serve to expand Islam’s territory.

This abnormal system has devastating sociological repercussions, including extremely high incidents of mental disorders, anti-social behaviour, emotional distress, paranoia, bullying, domestic violence, inbreeding, incest, low IQs, paedophilia, rape, homosexual behaviour, ownership of women and fanaticism. So to counteract and control these fallouts, Islam embeds a misanthropic religious mindset and implements extreme religious laws. An unnatural radical cultural system requires an unnatural radical rule of law with an indifferent attitude towards life and casualties.

 

Contracting Religions: condensation and subjugation

Although China has more recently adopted a corporate Islamic form of expansionism, in lesser recent times it opted to create a culture which pulled aggressively inward through the one-child policy. China’s lack of water, fertile soils and energy resources forced the government to impose a population control mechanism to cope with its high resources demand.

Should some argue that the one-child policy was not religious, I would respond that Buddhism is a religion engineered to subjugate and subdue its people so that extreme policies can be implemented without dissent. In saying this, I can hear my critics dismissing my claim by differentiating religion from government. However, this is a Western limited viewpoint which ignores the fact that in non-western cultures religions and governments are braided into one. This is a good video which explains this concept, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdvBYbNwXaY.

It is also worth noting that the cultural practice of fertility condensation is not a singular phenomenon unique to Mao’s China, varying forms of this practice exist in other Buddhist and resource-scarce countries and are mechanised via polyandry.

 

Stabilising Religions: preservation and sustainability

Where societies have ample resources, radical expansionism or extreme population condensation lead to extinction. In the first, it would be a detrimental strategy to implement, as access to unlimited resources could not keep in check the population growth. In the latter, it would serve as a progression dampener, as it would limit specialisation which leads to technological progress.

A resources-rich religion which chose to become a conservationist of wealth and a reinforcer of social stability is Christianity. It regulates its population growth via monogamy, controlling its population just enough to avoid a resources quick burn, to allow for familial and financial wealth accumulation and to drive technological advancement.

However, in recent times, Christianity is beginning to show signs of morphing in response to the growing resource competition and restrictions imposed upon it. Harmful religious add-ins include the LGBT+ morality, anti-Christianity atheists, MSM and educational systems’ cultural Marxist philosophy, high divorce rates, single parenting, child sexualisation, formative years childhood displacement, feminism, MGTOWs and many minorities’ religions are all threatening Christianity’s principles. An odd, contradictory mishmash of religions and movements, each striving to survive and out-compete the other, yet joining forces to create a single anti-Christian adversary marketed under the name of Progressivism. This is a collaborated parturition created to dismantle and undermine their biggest competitor – combine and surmount before the divide and conquer. But who engineers the engineers? Unbeknownst to the progressives, it too must transmute into a hybrid religion if it wishes to survive this war. The current compromises it inflicts upon itself must be normalised Christianity absorption is their ultimate goal. Engineering itself into a contracting polyamorous culture to give itself a competitive resource edge may become their price for victory.

The globalists engineering is confiscating and distributing our resources. It uses the climate change agenda to ration our energy resources. It thwarts water harvesting infrastructures to limit our water and food consumption. It restricts our food production by depriving farmers of water, self-propagating seeds and loans in an attempt to limit access to our soil resources. Our biased tax laws and out of control government budgets are draining the country’s and individual’s wealth. Our deindustrialisation makes us dependent on the government and other nations production. Our will and freedoms are being noosed around our necks until we can no longer breath, even to the current point of eradicating the most basic of western man’s right – freedom of speech. The elites are pushing the West into a population of helpless, unskilled, unfulfilled, unloved and unhappy people where refuge is sought through illegal, immoral and culturally detrimental activities. Our culture is being confiscated and then replaced by an engineered abomination that will destroy everything we hold dear. We are being robbed of our souls purely to feed the greed of the elites.

 

The Future

My dear reader, it is not my intent to sow pessimism, I have not chosen this topic to be the bearer of doom. As an optimist, I have chosen to christen my blog with this vitally important post precisely because I want to lay path-maps towards a stable, sustainable and secure future for Australia. The power to redirect Australia is within our grasp. It is time to take control of our resources, territories and laws. It is time to remove the weeds from our rich and beautiful environment. It is time to turn to a new leaf.

 

Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving