12 Socialist rules for identity politics play

According to Labor, the Liberals, and the Greens, everyone except for Labor, the Liberals and the Greens, are dividing the nation with identity politics tactics. But the truth is, they do use identity politics to gain votes, but have also fine tuned how to concealed their tactic by following the some basic rules.

1. Re-define reality.

Redefine democracy to mean socialism. It’s the only way people are able to accept such a wacky, envy-driven ideology and accept being tax-serfs for minorities.

 

2.  Infantilise minds.

Strip people’s independence, accountability and self-soothing environments which teach how to become adults and replace with undiscerning thinking, dependency, hand-outs and a nanny state.

 

3.  Promote the under-classes as the new super-classes.

Incentivise and recruit the vunerable and the limited with the promise of gold and supremacy.

 

4.  Dehumanise, demonise and discriminate the majority of Australians.

Privileged rapist.

 

5.  Sectionalise and create quarrelling identities.  Divide and conquer.

Equalise the inequality gap despite statistical analysis, limitations, what the minorities really want, where their talents lay, the resentment and hatred caused and displacing and scarring countless children.

 

6.  Use the struggle and noise created to further strip citizens of their rights.

Build platforms and armies of useful idiots who will allow for the insertion of more hate-speech, anti-discrimination, anti-free speech, anti-self-defense, anti-white laws and the implementation of minority quotas. Sneak in more anti-terrorist laws for good measure. (Never lose an opportunity to oppress)

 

7.  Shame people who refuse to join the Borg.

Anyone who attempts to point out the replacement of democracy with socialism occuring in Australia  is a big meanie or a troll.

 

8.  Camouflage the hypocrisy.

How can we possibly be divisive and play identity politics if we protect the underclasses, the victims and the minorities? We’re here to help because we care…

 

9.  Use minorties as human shields for self-protection.

We protect the underclasses and minorities. Even if it means that all whites must die.

 

10.  Deflect criticism.

Lalalalalala! Racist, racist, racist! Then ban, limit and censor to fix the problem.

 

11.  Create a bogeyman

People who do not agree with us are all Nazis!

 

12.  If all modes of control fail then attack and destroy.

Paper stone or scissors: fire, dox or assault.

 

Australian politicians have become extremely adept at using identity politics and then covering their tracks with these 12 shallow rules because dividing a culture pays excellent vote dividents. However, in doing so they are also exposing themselves to excellent chances for treason charges by a populist who may rise in the future.  I wouldn’t wanna be in their red, sparkly, tranny shoes should that happen…

Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving

A hard lesson in equality

 

Having a bit of free time, I thought it would be a good idea to stuff some extra wadding into my pillow of political knowledge to help me boost my little blog, so I enrolled in a couple of courses at Macquarie Uni.  What could be a better way to broaden one’s thinking and sharpen one’s debate skills, right? Right? Riiight??? Right…

Anyhoo …6pm of day 1 and I’ve already been insulted and reprimanded twice by my totalitarian tutor, who then proceeded to ban me from the class discussion forums, delete my second post and edit-out 3/4 of my original post. How many freshmen can boast such a feat I less than 24 hours and all whilst the other oblivious “Hi I’m Mohammad/Li/Hardik and I’m appreciative to be here!” students were too engrossed in the really the important part of the course – introductions.

So now you’re probably wondering what were these terrifying and traumatic posts which have scarred countless souls? Well, Here is the first:

 

Annabelle Post 1

Hi All

I am currently reading the Income & Wealth Inequality in Australia brief and I am taken aback by its biased perspective.

Firstly, I find it somewhat concerning that TIA’s (The Australian Institute) main donor is the Katers (leftist Zionist elites). Surely the Katers would apply some pressure onto TAI to propagandise their perspectives and goals and TAI would oblige to their requests as their survival relies on their donations?

Equally concerning is that the brief bases most of its arguments on an ex-senior vice president of the World Bank and a Georgist! (Georgism: private land ownership is abolished and all land becomes public.) At least with communism you get to keep a bit of land free of charge, but Georgism seems to be a hybrid of the worst of communism and the worst of corporatism. (Imagine if Australia were to be taken over by a foreign force with Georgism laws in place …I shudder!) I find myself unable to trust the opinion of such a person.

Thirdly, TAI has built its argument of the widening gap mostly on the concept that the main reason for the widening gap is that the ATO is not redistributing wealth. It even goes so far as to state the purpose of taxes is wealth distribution! (What about defence and infrastructure!?). TAI ignores to tackle many other reasons for the growing inequality in Australia, some of which being:

1. Widening inequality is an indication of a declining democracy (Chomsky). Since democracy can only exist in nations with average IQs of 90+, the constant influx of non-westerns into Australia is steadily pushing down the national IQ average. An argument can be made that the widening inequality gap is a symptom of multiculturalism.

2. The extremely high migration rates in Australia are increasing work competition. Employers can easily navigate lower salary jobs through such large human resource pools.

3. An economy structured on a two salary system, where women no longer have the choice to manage households are increasing job competition.

4. Exorbitant house prices in Australia is also contributing to the gab and some of the reason are:
     A. State governments are not releasing land. I think this is being encouraged            by a UN mandate (???)
     B. Houses are being snatched by non-Australians citizens (an estimate of                 15%+ of houses Australia wide, which would translate to a much higher %           in Sydney or Melbourne). Australian citizens are being out-competed.

5. Inadequate infrastructure to handle shifting the workforce further out of the city.

I may list more issues in the coming days. In the meantime I’d love to hear your opinions!
Annabelle

 

Tot-tut response 1

Dear Anna,

It is great to see that you have jumped straight into the reading for the week, and engaging in the forum, although you need to keep in mind that if you do this before the lecture, you may have the reading out of context. The first part of your post was thoughtful and to the point. However, your post went a little too far towards the end. It is quite opinionated and given that you don’t know anyone in the course, may give offence. I will be editing the section that I am concerned about.

Please bear in mind that students in the OUA stream in particular, but in the course in general may come from anywhere, and may be in any kind of situation. They may also come from anywhere, including outside Australia. They may be any age up from 13 years old. It would be best if you stick to the themes of the week and a considered reflection on argument of the reading, as your post began. The forums are learning spaces, not free speech spaces.
I hope you understand that I have an obligation to keep the space a welcoming space to all students. I am not discouraging dissenting views, by any means, and it was good to see another student challenge some of your views on the reading, but your post became a little too polemical for comfort – and polemics do not make for positive discussion.

Regards,
S

 

Annabelle Post 2

Heya

The only solution I see in this brief is taxes and more taxes and increase benefits. It also has a tendency to concentrate on millionaires over billionaires. Penalising the entrepreneurs is only going to assist the monster-corporations monopolies. The paper treads carefully over this point probably because TAI does not want to displease its primary (billionaire) donor.

There are a lot of cultural and economic ramifications in increasing benefits and taxes, yet not one is explored. For instance, what happens to the dignity of a nation where the State encourages benefits and rewards the non-earners over the earners? Independence is the building block of dignity. Independence also prevents tyrannical states from developing. I find this paper to be, at best, infantile and at worst deceitful.

To answer you, and please excuse my chops, but since I don’t agree with your connections I’ve broken down your questions to better lay out my ideas:
           

              Do you think we can correlate a declining democracy and income                             inequality with multiculturalism…
Yes. This is easily confirmed by simply looking at a world map and matching government systems to IQ averages.

              …when that has formed a fundamental part of Australia’s business,                         arts, sciences, events and lifestyle?”
Historically speaking, a monoculture has built both Australias (Aboriginal and Western) and Western foundations still dominate Australia. Western subcultures may differ in customs, diet and languages, but they unify in a single culture – the Western Christian culture. Hence, I do not consider Australia to have evolved through multiculturalism.

At present, Australia is beginning to go through a balkanisation of competing cultures, all wanting access to its resources. Elites are motivated by these conflicts as it advantages them. To paraphrase Margaret Mitchel, there is a lot more money to be made from the destruction of a nation than its construction.

               Australia has an obligation to accept, based upon international                                  obligations under human rights law and current domestic laws.
I abide by 3 obligations: 1. Myself (or God, if one believes) 2. My family & 3. My country. The obligation to the whole world belongs to the progressives, and I am not a progressive. The elites have everything to gain to demonise my ideology and globalise the world into one economy, as it would serve to expand their wealth and corporate monopolies.

2. Whilst I do see your perspective, I believe woman still have the choice to manage households. This choice appears only to be declining because of an increasing opportunity to participate which in turn contributes to decreasing gender income inequality.

For now families with $200K+ incomes or remote/some rural areas still have this choice, the majority of median income couples have to transfer their children’s ownership to the State and to day-care centres. I don’t think this paper even bothers to explore house prices and it most certainly does not look at the psychological effects of children being raised by institutions.

As for the gender pay gap, I don’t consider this brief is being honest. There are a lot of reasons as to why there are differences in the overall earnings between men and women and I’m not certain that they are negatives.

Annabelle

 

Tot-tut response 2

Anna,

You have already made your position clear. I am asking you to consider Netiquette before you post any further. It is not your opinions that are wanted, but a considered reflection of the course material. Since you have not had the opportunity to hear the lecture and apparently haven’t yet read the second reading, you are not doing this. I would appreciate it if you refrained from any further posts on the material in week 1 until you have heard the lecture and had time to think about why the reading has been set.

Regards,
S

This message was then followed by a forum closure. On day 3 the forum reappeared and my post 1 was slaughtered and reduced to this:

Annabelle Post 1 (edited by the Tot-tut)

Hi All
I am currently reading the Income & Wealth Inequality in Australia brief and I am taken aback by its biased perspective.

TAI has built its argument of the widening gap mostly on the concept that the main reason for the widening gap is that the ATO is not redistributing wealth. It [] state[s] the purpose of taxes is wealth distribution! (What about defence and infrastructure!?). TAI ignores to tackle many other reasons for the growing inequality in Australia.

Annabelle

Tot-tut removed Post 2

Annabelle’s transparent response 

Dear Tot-tut,

As you are using AusPol forum master privilege to intimidate, blackmail and bully me, I think a little transparency is well in order.  I write my response here, where the internet is my oyster and you are unable to censor me.

I had no idea that there were mandatory chronological rules for resources analysis.  So I should wait for both lectures, then read all the copious communist toilet worthy recommended reading list before I can utter a single word?  But wouldn’t that be enabling inequality to resources access as it would only leave me 3 days of interactive play?  Naïve little me thought that the point of a board is to challenge the resources and each other to deepen and clarify understanding and viewpoints. For the record, I made it abundantly clear that I was tackling the article, not the other shallow article, not the extra recommended reading, not the ever so subtle communist indoctrination lecture. As you say, context is important.

I don’t know anyone in the course, nor do I know you,  They, in turn, don’t know who I am and nor do you. And that’s fine, the forum is not a popularity pageant, it’s supposed to be an on-topic exchange in ideas and arguments. The internet is transforming everything. Universities going online is only the first step, the next shall be making people the likes of you redundant. It is the ultimate tool for democracy, a point missed by you, your ever so honest place-a-question-mark-at-the-end-of-my-leftist-persuasions-to-cover-myself boss, your institution and all of your other expired reading material.

For the record, I am most certainly am opinionated and controversial. Qualities, which I may add, are prerequisites for political careers. Please see, what’s the name of that other puritanical whore who called all men rapist? Her. Out of curiosity, do you also consider her anti-men woman supremacist stance opinionated and polemic? (Just wondering.)

Through this online open letter, I am confirming to you, as well as to the internet, that I am refusing to censor my on-topic critical thinking just so not to risk offending non-Western students and prepubescents. I am not responsible for other people’s feelings nor am I a baby sitter. If Western reason above passion value offends them, they are free to enrol in universities of their own culture. Australian universities should be tailored for Australians, as we are paying for them. Not that I believe for one instance that such people even care about my post – you are a coward who uses anonymous faces to protect your weak puritanical whore-like opinions and values.

Who are you really kidding, anyway? Fanatical Middle-eastern supremacists adore Adolf Hitler; racist Asians call us the “big-nosed trash of the Pacific;” Negroes are too busy on murder and rape rampages; commie academics twitter on a daily basis calls to genocide the West; and the majority of our prepubescents are Pepe loving neo-Nazis. Get with the programme.

I was completely on track and sticking to the theme of Inequality and was doing it by pointing our ho limited and out-of-date that communist policy brief is, which only serves to impart anti-human values. I provided a few points to demonstrate how shallow and subversive the report is, but I could have easily listed quite a few more. Despite your hysterical, fake-scandalised reaction used to substantiate your offensive and oppressive behaviour towards me.

Learning without free speech (the vehicle which carries critical thinking) is the equivalent of memorising and regurgitating the Quran. How about you go cover yourself in a synthetic tent rag, point your toosh up in an inviting manner and recite the Karl Marx, instead of imposing your communist derived values on to me.

I’ll end this little tete-a-tete with the best quote of the week “There is no attempt to compress anyone into a set of ideas or beliefs. This is very much an open study and you find your own way to conclusions that you frame and shape.” – Prof Geoffrey cast-a-stone-and-hide-the-hand Hawker 26 February 2019 lecture.

Times are changing, S, the internet is morphing into the ultimate frame for our ideas and beliefs. Get ready for a very tight gap.

Sincerely,
Annabelle

The death of the neo-liberal puritanical whore

The weak confuse puritanism with purity. And courage with surrender.

 

When I see an elderly woman soliciting feminism my immediate thought is that she is making a retirement fund investment.  Only a woman of retirement age could be so oblivious to the cultural swing occurring in the West – puritanical whore-ism is on the way out.

No comment for fear of offending irony.

I cannot think of a better way to capture this blossoming cultural shift than with Julie Bishop’s (second) staged resignation. A contaminated old heart waving a lily-white frock, whilst threatening to spill the dirt on her party should they not pass her seat on to another puritanical whore.  Powerless, unpopular amongst her peers and discarded by her owner into a final disposable farewell performance, she dictates and threatens tens of senators (our cuckold PM inclusive) with a “do as I say or else.’  And what is Julie Bishop capable of exactly? Will she ssspit regurgitated poison or write yet another strategically timed, make-believe political memoir packed with pedestrian spite? Yawn. Show me the nuclear missiles or get out, has-been Medusa.

Women of strength have always existed and they do not use infantile feminist tactics to gain power. They choose to weaponise their cryptographs and anchor their bloodhounds’ devotion.  Indeed, such a woman was Thatcher who weaponised the colour blue, turning it into an anti-comunista flag which decorated her structured suits-armor.  Queen Elizabeth I, another powerhouse, weaponised her chaste sexuality to circumvent masculine barriers and to weave herself, her nation and her religion together. She engineered her persona into an iconic symbol that embodied crown, people and culture – power’s holy trinity.

Thatcher turned the Tory blue into an anti-comunista war flag.Those lacking resources are not in a position to bluff – puritanism is a cloak for the corrupt and a noose for the strong.  Feminism is a control mechanism for the weak to prevent the strong from rising …but the illusion is shattering. Good riddance to weakness and power be to the rebirth of the West’s Glorianas!

A barren wasteland cannot dictate terms.

 

Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving

(Ghost) Busting the Parliament House

A long time ago, in the evil, evil Kerry Packer headquarters, there hid a nasty, little Slimer which took advantage of Mr. Packer’s uncivilized behaviour. Kerry Packer, one of Australia’s esteemed mafioso elites, having the patience of a pit-bull and the intuition of a dung beetle, would summon his staff by calling them and abruptly stating, “ Kerry Packer here, come to my office.” Then terminating his calls with the same finesse as his introduction. Of course, such refinement and empathy inspired immediate attention, and those who chose not to obey his laws a pink invitation slip would greet them following day.

The resourceful, little Slimer took advantage of Kerry’s unsophisticated ways and put it to use by creating his very own staff filtering system. It would call journalists and staff members impersonating the God-dung Himself. When the oblivious staff member promptly reported himself to the Dung-ball’s chamber, he would be greeted with foul language followed by a pink slip.
Word travelled quickly through the evil headquarters, but no one was brave enough to tell Mr Dung the truth. Staff chose to live in fear over facing the evil master in person. If the fake dung beetle called and the journalist chose to follow through the request, they risked being fired.  If it was the real dung beetle who called and the journalist did not proceed, they also risked being fired. Quite a conundrum. Soon enough, after several staff reshuffles, the Slimer achieved his goal and was never heard of again.

For some coincidental reason, the recent poltergeist activities occurring in the federal Parliament House prompted this old phantasmagorical memory to appear in my head, again.  And is it any wonder with all the paranormal activities occurring on a daily basis!?  Lights switch off and on at the most inopportune moment.  Alarm bells are sounded just when the rapefugee panic gripped the pollies.  Ghost hatters are hacking into pollies servers.  And an innocent staff member who was prancing around the corridors of the parliament very late at night, minding his own business, suddenly got possessed by an evil entity which turned him into a serial killer forcing him to strike an elderly senator and drawing blood!  Could there be naughty,  little Gremlins or Slimers living in the air ducts of the Parliament House or is this entity something more sinister? And what is its end-game?  If I worked there an unregistered nuclear accelerator sure would sound mighty appealing.  My advice: learn to meditate and purify your souls  as you never know is God appears before you and asks, ” Choose the form of your destructor.”

Could Sarah Hanson-Young have fed a cute little gremlin after midnight after her routine midnight rendezvous?

 

Was James Ashby slimed or possessed?

 

Why is a resourceful Gremlin hacking into the pollies’ servers?

 

Is an Annabelle doll being displayed in one of the glass cabinets?

 

Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving

Labor’s supremacy of the inferior

Up-to-his-old-tricks Bill 2.0 seal

 

We marvel at the enterprising, predatory aptitude of an Australian Firehawk lighting a bush on fire to enhance its chances of a catch. We hold tremendous respect for the cooperative efforts of a pack of wolves hunting down a prey. We applaud the speed of a cheetah, the fierceness of a lion and the measured strength of an owl. We admire power. We admire speed. We admire intelligence. And we do so because we covet superiority.

 

Women’s-quota 2.0 seal

 

The left, comprised of the weakest portion of society and thus unable to compete or steal such gifts, redefines the classes to pin groups against each other. It has created an exalted aristocracy for those who cannot compete – the supremacy of the inept class. But it’s a trap. They ensnare the most venal and incompetent sections of our society with fake promises of God-like status and freebies, whilst their independence and maturity are slow-cooked in a crumbling, old cauldron hidden in a dark attic. The Australian quasi-communist Labor party is nothing more than a political underbelly which seeks to gain control through censorship, (inverted) classism, tax enslavement, land confiscation, energy rationing, resources cheap sell-off, divisiveness, moral erosion, blackmail, bribery, threats and treason.  Innate inferiority is what motivates Labor to canonise inadequacy and demonise capacity.

 

Pedo 2.0 seal

 

This gang of subversive, amoral opportunists is taking advantage of the Liberal’s weak predicament. They care not for ordinary Australian citizens and are more than happy to screw us over for monetary and aberrant carnal rewards. They’ve promoted themselves as Australia’s moral traffic controllers, governing who gets to go, who must stop and who must go to jail.  They operate a multi-functioning engineered mechanism patented as liberal moralitywith the added bonus of also functioning as a propagation machine attracting the crafty (who pretend not to understand) and the limited (who have no capacity to understand). The result is a sickening, incestuous, left-fest breeding programme seeking to recruit, en masse, twisted creatures open to extortion controls …all the way down its food chain. Pawn within pawn, bribery within bribery, corruption within corruption. Yet, they have the gall to want to police our morals and speech. Ah!

Labor’s incestuous breeding programme

 

However, like every other socialist takedown of the West’s cultural fabric, this neo-liberal hierarchical system is doomed. A class of leafhoppers, no matter how much they are bolstered by elites’ stolen money, cannot drive an economy, cannot regulate the abled, cannot drive technology and innovation, cannot capture the imagination and passion of humanity and they most certainly cannot set standards. When I see Labour party members I feel nausea, not respect. When I see a disabled person I feel pity, not admiration. When I am forced to pay a middle eastern man with an intrusion of cloaked women and children trailing behind him, I feel resentment, not benevolence.

 

Rapey 2.0 seal

 

For many non-Western cultures, disabilities are viewed as blessings, usually legitimised through religion as having been “touched by God”. This is an excellent cultural mechanism which helps preserve the less fortunate, encourage people to help each other and prevent a culture from spiraling into wanting to eliminate its weakest, devolving into nihilism or purism.  However, this is only possible if the incapacitated are viewed as needing help from abled.  Gratitude and humility are integral ingredients to prompt charity, help and social cohesion.  If the unfortunate is raised above the abled, then pity will devolve into resentment and benevolence into useless eater euthanasia – an evil system which leads to cultural misanthropy and nihilism, the path the Labor party has chosen to force upon Australia for their thirty pieces of silver. Shame on Bill, shame on Labor, shame on ingratitude, shame on willful ignorance and shame on the disloyal.

 

It’s-not-about-the-sex-it’s-about-power 2.0 seal

 

Enough. Call the elections and let people moon over the Australian Firehawk!

 

Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving

 

Slicing off the fat – keto diet for the Government

 

For some months, I have been successfully losing weight using the “sensible Australia dietary guidelines”. The process has been slow, and if I’m honest with myself, designed for failure. Don’t get me wrong, I held my ground, but I understood its temporary nature.

More recently, however, a friend of mine recommended intermittent fasting, which then developed into the Keto diet. Initially, I scoffed and dismissed both to protect my feelz and diet program narrative, but Youtube’s subliminal messages worked their magic. A single view prompted more recommendations, and then another and so on and so forth. Soon enough my observing turned into applying. Science and logic always win me over.

To cut a long story short, this dietary lifestyle is taking off in Australia like a loaded B52 itching for a bombardment mission – a diet revolution in the making. It rejects lobbyist derived government recommendations by spraying sugar witchcraft with MTC cold pressed extra virgin oil. It shatters everything we understand about food and health and exploits nature’s loopholes. They say truth always rises, but it always seems to be Western science which always soars and catapult civilization into a new reality. Keto is the diet wheel re-invented and there’s no stopping it.

So, anyway, this got me thinking …why not apply Keto and fasting principles to our fat, sluggish governments? Keto would do them a world of good. Imagine an efficient team working for the people instead of working to increase their fat deposits. Imagine a lean, flag-waving pollie-team, all lined up like a freshly sharpened penciled ammunition belt ready to shoot solutions, wealth growth and stability, instead of kissing donors’ arse.  Hell, let’s imagine how we could improve them just for kicks!

 

1.  Keto sharpens the mind and delays Alzheimer.
This is the age of political 4D chess playing. Politicians with intellectual disabilities, unable to plan for the future, come up with good solutions, and out-scheme the lobbyists, would greatly benefit from a bureaucracy-fat burning keto diet. The naturally born dunces who resist improvement can be easily pinpointed and readily thrown out onto the reject pile.

 

2.  Keto burns off useless and unsightly fat deposits.
Enough of sending flabby and morbidly obese pollies overseas to represent the Australian people. This gives a negative message to other countries – weakness and laziness. Politicians must personify fortitude and agility. Get ripped or get out.

Sexy and fit Michelle Jennecke would make an excellent replacement to our diseased, diet-traitor Marise Payne as the Minister of Foreign Affairs. Marise would be deployed as an unsinkable evacuation raft for the in-coming illegals now that the floodgates have been officially re-opened.

 

3.  Keto is satiating.
Politics would become so much more satisfying to the 30% of Australians who can’t speak English.  Increasing minorities’ understanding as to what the federal government is up to would speed up cultural integration. Promise.

Top, left to right: Lemon King, Murky Mike, Billy the Defiler & Bewitching Coal-stashing Riccardo. Not the most physically appealing lot, but with the correct plan their profound intellectualism has the potential to satiate the minds of all Australians.

 

4.  Keto is delicious – it doesn’t fight nature, it works with it.
Keto allies with nature to satiate the palette. Why force the people to swallow tasteless insipid, soy-weak language salads saturated in low-quality illegals and divisive over-processed feminism ideology. We could, instead, have power-salads sprinkled with punches of bold flavours such as taking back our resources, real tax cuts, real border protection, infrastructure catch-up and a hell of lot more jobs. We are in desperate need of flavoursome ideas to counteract the self-loathing force feeding unhealthy diet the government is pushing on us.

Yummy vs Soy-érzi

 

5.  Keto gives you energy and focus.
The misapplied energy bursts our federal politicians are releasing are very concerning to the Australian people. House debates have become screaming matches with no substance and no wit. It has devolved into a cheap reality-TV show lacking argumentation, deductive reasoning, intelligence, truthful data, balls, loyalty and, most importantly, a point. Most of the time the questioned politician does not address the question, opting instead to take the opportunity to propagandise. Being thrown out of the chamber is at an all-time high, as is profanity and, more recently, violent behaviour. They’ve become a heard of undignified mountain goats perched in their seats, loudly bleating to showcase their enormous cucked-antlers. Placing these scattered, horn-queans on a keto diet would help harness their thinking and regulate their testosterone and insulin levels.

Scattered goat-queans proudly exposing their horns.

 

6.  Keto makes you very regular.
Super non-GMO feeds for super results followed by super fasts for a deep cleansing detoxification.

Unblocking the pipes will clarify politicians’ thinking.

 

7.  Keto is anti-inflammatory.
Keto reduces hunger hormones and increases calming hormone. And chamomile is a keto friendly.

Taking keto strip testing to a new level.

 

The overton window, as to what constitutes healthy eating, is shifting, and it has done so in an extremely short time frame. The West’s enthusiasm to adopt this new way of thinking demonstrates its enormous learning ability and adaptability. Increasingly, new Keto foods are being manufactured and are appearing in grocery stores in spite of veganism (a Marxist derived radical food ideology) and junk food programming (a corporate Marxist victims’ addiction) imposed on our culture.  Australians are showing the government that we have the ability to supersede deceitful strategies and programming, and that we can adapt and progress at a very rapid pace. All thanks to the internet.

Keto is just the first step, we have the ability to change the worlda unified team. If our pathetic government refuses to adapt and shed off their massive stock of toxic fat, it shall be obliterated. If the MSM continues to act like cancer-inducing insulin triggers, it shall be destroyed. Our soils for our health. Our government for our people. Our Media for the truth. Trim the fat from Canberra and make Australia healthy again!

Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving

 

A Royal Prerogative

The English fought a civil war over this matter. The Civil war in England between King Charles I and the parliament was over the right of the parliament or the King to make the appropriation.

Sir Christopher Pyne, 12.02.2019

 

 

RapeyBill 2.0: I couped the Crown to welcome rapey illegalz! Open the floodgates.

 

Lord of the Lemons: I deem only illegalz with kidz can rape Auztralia! Open the floodgates.

Which rape enabler will you vote for? 

 

Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving