When a perfidious spirit is transported to the underworld there is no return.
Light a candle for the departing spirit.
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
When a perfidious spirit is transported to the underworld there is no return.
Light a candle for the departing spirit.
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
On this occasion, I’ll let the Australian people speak for me. I’ll only add one little thing: extreme regulating has become the new refuge for scoundrels.
“…Love for all hatred for none (x2), which I believe are words which should be embraced by all in this time and age. We are a community who also know very well that hate speech can result in innocent lives being taken just as we have witnessed in the Christchurch attack. As a hijab-wearing Muslim, I am fearful of what is to come especially as such hate has already come from certain leaders. To prevent any future targeted attacks which arise from online hate speech and brainwashing, my question to the panel is how free should free speech be in Australia and how can we target the hatemongering, where is the balance?’ Rabia Shariff.
My Dear Rabia
I realise you have been selected to ask a fake and weaponised question to a fake and weaponised panel of traitors and dingbats and that your question has probably been fine-tuned by people who want to take down my culture, but hey, I’ll play.
“Your” question is based on a faulty definition of free speech and understanding of Western culture. Your correlation between hate speech being the cause for massacres is an unsubstantiated opinion. Furthermore, your failure to understand how fundamental free speech is to Western culture is a clear indication that you have failed to integrate into my culture.
Islam, just these past few days has sponsored a 3-year sting operation in an attempt to take down an Australian conservative party just prior to an election – this is an act of political aggression, not peace. Islam, just these past few days, has also threatened any Australian wanting to visit Gallipoli and pay their respect to our WW1 soldiers, this is an act of aggression, not peace. And you have the gall to state that your religion of misanthropy comes in peace and imply that we need to curb our right to freedom of speech to accommodate your destructive religion!?
What has made the West into the greatest culture in the world is our ability to divorce passion from reason. What has reduced Islamic nations into violent, zealot spiralling squalors is their inability to divorce passion from reason. It is precisely this difference which makes Islam more incompatible to the West than all the other non-western cultures put together.
For decades Westerns have had no choice but follow our corrupt governments’ agenda (both left leaning and right leaning). They, and the MSM, have consistently showered us with multiculturalism propaganda and created the false illusion that Westerns were complicit and impotent, but then came the internet and the voices of the many is being restored.
As a result, the MSM and the governments are in panic mode. They are afraid of being dethroned, they are afraid of landing in jail for treason, they are afraid of a revolt. So they do the only thing they can do, default to censor freedom of speech using the law and micromanage our every movement, in a pathetic, delusion attempt to create a synthetic state of peace.
As a Western woman with Christian foundations, I am not submitted into wearing head coverings or endure sexual mutilation to prove my morality or my worth. I enjoy my freedom, my equal status, my culture, my ability to speak my mind. Freedom of speech must be restored in Australia and hate speech laws scrapped, as they are nothing more than a control tool. Australia can only solve its terrorist attacks by banning all Islamic immigration, stripping criminal’s citizenships, outlaw Islamic costumery and shutting down Mosques which only serve to recruit and groom extremists. Hate mongering, subversive cultural manipulation and the endless stream of Islamic terrorist attacks that have occurred on Australian soil due to the religion of misanthropy shall be resolved once and for all.
Nothing symbolises the battle between good and evil like a mongoose killing a snake. It’s the battle of morality vs the obscene, of freedom vs bondage, finesse vs hideousness and even wit vs the myopic. It’s St George slaying the dragon.
This battle is a reoccurring theme embedded in many cultures and nations. An example is a famous Jamaican children’s song, which has been a favourite for generations. https://youtu.be/f9dYH1c5Dr4
Whilst in the Western countries, mongoose poems and memes sprinkle the internet.
Of all the creatures on the loose
there’s none to match the odd mongoose
with pointed snout and chops a lickin’
for a tasty meal of snake or chicken.
Oh, there’s some who think him just a meercat
who’d snatch your omelette just like that
but when he’s feeling really blue
he’ll munch on a critic (maybe two).
Robert Charles Howard
So why is the mongoose such a popular evil slaying metaphor? Here is the shortlist:
1. They are fierce, a courageous pocket rocket. https://youtu.be/4I39dmsWKpw
2. They excel at replicating with a phenomenal ability to nurture and protect their young. https://youtu.be/8mxjF6lZ3ps
3. They are the ultimate snake hunter. Already covered, but worth emphasising. https://youtu.be/yRowC6t8tjA
4. They have a playful disposition with a great sense of humour. https://youtu.be/jd8-ac461CY
5. They are adorable, in a non-intimidating or narcissistic way. Mongooses have rounded babyfaces, which tug our altruistic heartstrings and big expressive cat eyes, which communicate with our souls. They inspire tenderness and love. I think Andrew Vachhs best summed up the mongoose agenda with “When you hunt predators the best camouflage is weakness.”
There you have it, a compact list of what makes this compact predator so noteworthy – agility, audacity and so damn cute rolled into an efficient mini-predator.
A pray in remembrance to all the millions of Christians who have been murdered and slain around the world by Islam and communists.
Currently, in the West, there is only one thing that unites the left and the right – our inability to control our reactions to the collectivised mental disorders existing everywhere we look. These pathologies are affecting everyone, even those who choose to dig their heads in the sands. Narcissism is the most prevalent of all the disorder, which has exploded from 1% to nearly 7% in recent years.
There is no doubt that most of the blame rests upon the social engineers who have built the perfect infrastructure for this mental disorder to thrive. Single mothers, promiscuity, female supremacy, inferior supremacy, romanticising mental conditions, envy based redistribution of people’s wealth and other Marxist ideologies, have worked together to erode the West’s moral, social and religious core values which functioned to protect us from such an occurrence.
Whilst researching, I discovered that there does not exist a single deranged symptom within narcissism which is not expressed by politicians, SJWs, feminists, leftists, professors and other minorities. Every. Single. One. Below, I have made a quick table listing some of the most basic symptoms of narcissism and have given a simple and internet famous example to demonstrate the how these abnormal behaviours are expressed in our culture. However, as the symptom list is significantly longer than my list, I leave it up to the reader to research narcissism and think of other examples.
Symptoms of narcissism vs culture
Brenton Tarrant terrorism, cultural narcissism exposed
Now that the nature of narcissism has been set out, I shall explore a detailed example on how these disturbed people are endangering the West’s security and how they protect themselves from taking any responsibility.
In the West, cultural narcissists have become very adept at using devasting events to push their pathologies on to societies at large. One such event is the New Zealand mosque shooting. Jacinta Arden, New Zealand’s Prime Minister, went out of her way to use this massacre as a virtue signalling pageantry. Within hours of the shooting, Arden set the pace by initially declaring further limits to already limited gun laws.
She then proceeded into a full blown narcissism attack, using Islamic costume props and enacting exaggerated scenes of empathy. (Excessive displays of feelings and outrage are expressions of narcissism.) She carefully shifted blame from herself to the New Zealand population through sharing an Islamic pray hosted in the NZ parliament, generously showering victims’ families with tax payer’s money, sponsored state funerals and offered to pay for corpse transfers to any destination in the world. A stereotypical narcissist manipulative manoeuvre to reel in the scapegoats and then guilt trip them by deflecting the blame on to them .
Arden also rendered the killer nameless, making it easier for her to conceal her participation in the creation of a lethal cultural concoction. Another narcissistic distraction and deflection technique: by dehumanising the mass murderer it helped her seem more human – a vampire sucking life from an unscrupulous criminal.
So not to be outdone by the most efficient Auschwitzian terrorist operation in my lifetime, a noble delinquent physically assaulted a senator (from behind) and orchestrated Haka primitive war dances toddled on TV screens like flocks of wingless kiwi birds for days on end. Narcissistic compulsion to outcompete and exaggerated fake morals.
Right on cue, the virtuous ABC pulled out their reserve team of control freaks and Chinese sponsored communists, who I have never seen before and, luckily, very likely never to see again, all arrogantly singing in unison that the people don’t have the right to view streams, to share streams, to talk about streams, to mention anyone in streams, to identify people in streams, to think about streams and even dream about streams. Drunk on their delusions of control and having more than 6 geriatrics who regularly listen to their putrid vomit, they took it one step further by also stating that the killer must remain nameless, faceless, bodiless and raceless (but not sexless). In fact, all criminals must remain nameless, faceless, bodiless and raceless (but not sexless). What a convenient, cunning plan to aid their control over Australians, attempting to manipulate and dilute our ability to make crime and race connections, so to save their sorry arses.
Whilst Channel 10 got the ultimate communist narcissistic misanthrope to cry and virtue signal simultaneously, whilst ever so subtly throwing a threat in for good measure. Salt and kilij may indeed mix, diluted salt makes an excellent disinfectant. In case of injury, that is.
Channel 7, on the other hand, under the pretext of debate, boobytrapped into a corner another senator who did not agree with the narcissists’ narrative. They silenced her by not giving her any opportunity to respond through a coordinated and relentless misogynistic bullying. These two arseholes, one being an ex-MSM stooge and an alcoholic and the other a current MSM stooge and a vapid, quarrelsome eunuch, teamed their narcissism to also shift the blame on to Pauline Hansen. Scapegoating and deflection are classical narcissistic techniques of manipulation, and these two losers went full throttle – dehumanising, torturing and humiliating Pauline to feed their need to feel significant, impactful and special. Like Saint Magdalene Arden, this chauvinistic, disturbed duo coordinated a vicious attack so to distract viewers from considering their culpability to the Tarrant massacre.
This sleazy day time soapie production was then followed by the Australian government which decided to ban Milo from entering Australia (yet again) and which prompted another ABC intellectual brainstorm where they decided to override the constitution and ban all senators who resist their narcissistic narrative. Again, arrogance and delusions of importance are symptoms of narcissism.
Last night, Australian Telcos also joined the gang and decided to cut off Australia’s access to numerous news and discussion sites such as 4chan/pol and Zero Hedge. Welcome to China, folks.
Erdogan, like all Muslims, a loud-mouthed little tyrant who likes to milk violent Islamic sentiments through Muslim ignorance, took this opportunity to theorise a conspiracy reminiscent of a James Bond movie. After seeing that neither kindred-narcissist, Saint Magdalena Arden or Lemon-king Morrison, have the balls to do their jobs, Erdogan pushed his Islamic agenda further by inciting Islamic unrest within Australia with the hope to activate more jihadist massacres. The little tyrant threatened to kill Australians who visit the Turkish-shithole and also desecrated of our WWI heroes, who gave their lives so that we could be free. One would be forgiven to think that Lemon-king Morrison could have used this opportunity to redeem his uselessness, but Lemon-Loser Morrison delivered the usual submissive, virtue signalling, victimised narcissist response – a cowardly narcissist incapable to undertake the duty of a Prime Minister. This gutless, corrupt bag of compost needs to be tossed out asap, he poses a serious threat to Australia’s national security.
In the narcissist’s competitive mind, the issue they see here is not that Brentan Tarrant exterminated 50 misanthropes, rather, that he was better at killing than their pet misanthropes. Brentan Tarrant has raised the terrorist bar to new heights. He has propagandised the event like no other terrorist has ever done, one week in and the media and pollies are still discussing this event. He single headedly killed 50 and injured another 50 without getting a scratch on himself. He multitasked his killings between 2 mosques. He streamed a significant portion of his massacre. He has exposed the hypocrisy and totalitarianism of the left, the pollies and the media. And most importantly, he has managed to get significant support from the internet.
It sickens me to see that these narcissistic loons are motivated by envy. Yes, let that sink in – the left is envious of the efficiency and clever layers within this massacre. Their envy is pushing them to out-compete a mass killer in any which way they can – virtue signalling, scapegoating senators and the people, shifting blame, making threats, controlling the people through censorship and guilt tripping, arresting and threatening the people for nothing. If it weren’t so frightening it would be hilarious.
God bless the West and deliver us from these disturbed manipulators who are incapable of true love and empathy.
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
If we still believe in some concept of inherent human dignity, it’s precisely at moments like this that it matters. In the same way that human rights matter most when we’re sorely tempted to dispense with them, human dignity becomes most meaningful when we’re tempted to strip it; when we’re confronted with those we think least deserve it; when we’re asked to give it to those who have done something terrible or even denied that dignity to others. That may not satisfy our anger. It might even leave us disappointed. But it’s in that very tension that we discover the difference between vengeance and justice.
Waleed Aly for the Age 15.03.2019
Hi Walee! I have one burning question to ask from a pro-Chirstian perspective to a pro-Muslim perspective …has your primary wife been “fixed”? Surely, there is no greater dignity for a woman.
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
Sometimes, I get the feeling that the globalists are stalking my site. Electronic scribbles “written with a thumb-nail dipped in tar” and amateur tripwires abound. The latest doodle I stumbled upon causing me to fall [insert winking face here] was Wikipedia‘s flag-waving definition appearing first on my site’s name search.
I wonder how the average working-class Aussie feels about being ridiculed in such a way when he or she searches for my site. I would image they would feel emotions of rage or irritation for being slyly mocked and manipulated without any effort to disguise! We no longer seem to have the right to be nationalists, to be proud of our nation and of our flag. And most certainly don’t have the right to criticise with honesty. Perhaps Google needs to make similar attempts to control other nationalistic peoples through malevolent links to demonstrate that they are indeed impartial.
I am curious to see how the jews would feel if Google denigrates them for waving their flag.
Or perhaps the globalists soldiers?
The Chinese ought to be treated the same, too.
Let’s not forget the blacks in America.
When is Google going to link sly definitions to these hotties?
Any globalist Google staff game enough to ridicule this dude’s nationalism?
My dearest shallow pools of greed and misery, everything has the potential to be weaponised and mocked. Even plastic toys can be deadly if thrust into people’s temples. The trick, though, is to do it in such a way as not to make a complete fool of yourself or to harvest. See below.
…I’m so lucky univarsety iz learnin me all about critikal thunking. I sincerely hope you appreciate my newly gained skillz.
The revision timetable was the topic of the week in one of my university subjects. Through meticulous detail, the lecturer explained how and when students should schedule their classes, study, work, essays and even play. The importance of setting hour by hour schedules for the each unit’s components was stressed: 1-hour block x3 for the reading component, 1-hour block for each lecture, various hour blocks for essay subcomponents and a just in case 1-hour block xX study buffer schedule just in case one falls behind. As I sat still listening to the lecture with feelings of mechanisation and incredulousness slowly sucking me in, a passage from Red Dwarf popped into my head:
And now he sat there, under the pink glow of his student’s table lamp, preparing to sit for the astronavigation exam for the thirteenth time. He found the process of revising so gruellingly unpleasant, so galling, so noxious, that like most people faced with tasks they find hateful, he devised a more and more elaborate way of not doing it in a doing it kind of way. In fact, it was now possible for Rimmer to revise solidly for three months and not learn anything at all.
The first week of study he would always devote to the construct of a revision timetable. Every hour of every day was subdivided into different study periods, each labelled in his lovely, tiny copperplate hand then painted over in watercolours. A different colour for each subject, the colours gradually becoming bolder and more urgent shades as the exam time approached.
The only problem was this, because the timetables often took seven or eight weeks to complete, by the time Rimmer had finished them the exam was almost on him. He’d then have to cram three months astronavigation revision into a single week. Gripped by almost a deranging panic, he then decides to sacrifice the first two days of that final week to making another timetable, this time for someone who had to pack three months revision into five days.
So I laughed, loudly and wholeheartedly. It broke the trance.
At this point little background to my passion for planners is in order. like chicks of today, I love a good planner session. My colour coded felt-tip pens prompt an auto-smile every time I unzip my (planner-only) pencil case, where chocolate freckle treasures are lay hidden. Little queues of vivid colours clutched by tiny elastic loops inviting me to touch them. Faint whiffs of sweet vanillin from the sharpened pencils bring images of old books to the mind. Gleaming miniature brass icon stencils adding tinkles of glam and magic. Little smiling babushka doll post-it-notes always so happy to see me, whilst the undercover staple-pen and scissors-pen add a healthy dose of clever utility. A little treasure chest gleefully ready to be put to use in my Erin Condren planner aiding my lists, priorities, dates and lots of tick-ready boxes. Blissful joy.
Although I allow myself to plan like a 10-year-old, I recognise it for what it is – as an indulgent, fun pursuit, the equivalent of a nail polish or spice collection. And I’m not alone in this, the planner community is the first to admit it to be a hobby. So, what gives with the uni.
I suspect right-wingers reading this blog-post would dismiss this lecture to be one more sign of an infantilised culture and the lowering of standards in education existing today. Although I don’t disagree with these assertions, I do find them to be superficial. In my past jobs, I have used every conceivable planner system to exist. Some electronic, some paper, combinations, many I have conceived and adapted and then some. Through my planner experience, I have come to understand that if not careful, planning kills creativity, amongst other issues.
Another issue with planners is that they teach dependency. Marketed as peace-of-mind yielders, the gimmick does not divulge that once a planner habit has been established it enslaves its user. The, so called, peace of mind is achieved by draining the mind of all the prompts and reminders which normally swim in our heads and keep us alert and intellectually active. Do not underestimate the importance of those prompts, they have lived in our heads to thousands of years. A brain which has been relieved of all its micro-task reminders begins to distrust its own judgment and memory. The doubt is then tunneled to more scheduling and lists until every inane and inconsequential part of life is cataloged. Fitness tasks, shopping lists, meal plans, work goals, study goals, supplements and water consumption, daily routines such as washing your face and shaving, top 3 priorities, top 7 to-dos, low priority top 10 lists begin to populate the planner. Avid planners’ lists and tasks become so numerous that many foster numerous planners to keep track of all their lists. In fact, “I cannot rest until it’s in my planner” is a common complaint with those who adopt the planner lifestyle. They also admit that the prospect of losing their planners would be terrifying, as a planner contains their “whole lives”.
Due to the religious void that has been created in the West, the modern planner has also substituted confession, where failure to tick off your daily tasks or miss an appointment sit on your “today” page like missing beads from a rosary. Naturally, whenever sinning is present disappointment ensues so the planner becomes a self-policing tool which controls your lists and schedules via guilt.
If the dependency, self-surveillance and guilt tripping wasn’t quite enough, planners also has a tendency to limit spontaneity and creativity. Imposed time restrictions suppress innovation and productivity. Has anyone ever heard of a new formula being conceived during an exam? There are valid reasons as to why tertiary education tend to substitute exams and quizzes for essays and theses. Scheduled restrictions discourage in-depth reflections because it gives users a valid reason for superficial research and understanding. In fact, the lecture I was exposed to encouraged this very notion. Throughout history, the West’s greatest philosophers, mathematicians, scientists and writers ad-libbed their time, adapting as needed, they did not interrupt their flow or restricted their research into 1-hour blocks. The most interesting thinkers of today mostly reside on youtube and in blogs – for the first time in a century or more, these venues are allowing thinkers to dedicate their lives to reflection, time constraint-free. Corporations, governments and the academia, on the other hand, are laying the building blocks for a time oppressed world and the proof is in the pudding – they’ve created a world of mediocrity.
While surfing the net, I found an interesting little formula:
don’t know what field this formula was taken from, but it does encapsulate the essence of planners – a primitive Amazon AI, formulating and coding your life so that it can predict your next purchase before you through understanding your interests and then controlling the ads you are exposed to. Planners dehumanise us into predictable NPCs. Those who understand such a basic control tool can easily use it for the purpose of manipulation – simply add another schedule or taskbar to train us to do whatever the elites want us to do. Self-inflicted serfdom.
The last issue of the planner lifestyle is the illusion of time well spent they create. Viewing all your tasks marked off and every appointment ticked off gives dopamine hits. It makes you feel as though achievement of something important, as though one has accomplished something meaningful. However, truth be known, the person has only completed everyday tasks that would otherwise still be have been completed if they had not been listed in a planner. It is called living and if you don’t partake you die or get fired.
However, planners make sure to avoid listing the truly significant moments of our lives. Perhaps a funny joke you share with your wife which made her giggle and allowed you to share a blissful moment or the soft kiss you snuck on your sleeping baby’s forehead on your way to bed or a new way to approach a work-related problem on your lunch break whilst biting into a tuna sandwich. The important stuff, human interactions and serendipitous thoughts. The younger generations who have been seduced into the planner lifestyle, are being fooled into thinking that their lists are a substitute for their atomised existence.
Since planner evolution has significantly sped up in the past decade, I cannot dismiss that it has been, at least in part, engineered. However, the propeller behind the evolution has been the cultural and religious voids which now exist in the West. The survival instinct is deeply ingrained in all living things, as such, we have a propensity to pass it on to the things we create. Our thoughts, aspirations and inventions can take on a life of their own. As their creator, we speak the same language, so they can read our desires and adapt their progression according to them. Governments, academia, corporations, technology, the educational system are all examples of how man-made systems have taken a life of their own, initially evolving to satiate our (manipulated) desires, but later evolve to out-compete humanity. We must never forget that creativity and the family unit is what separated and made the West so great and no agenda can ever replace all that we have achieved and all that we are.
Annabelle @The Art of Flag-waving
If science indicates that free-play helps animals, children and adults destress and problem solve, why do corporatists and their platforms discourage it? Trolling is the ultimate definition of adult free-play: free-flowing, interactive, non-committal and above all else, fun! So I ask myself, why would governments, and their minions, bogeyman the term and dehumanise debate instigators to iNazi looking to gas millions of users.
There is little doubt the most amusing internet free-players are right-wing “trolls,” as they don’t hide their ideology just as they can’t hold back their quips. Creative one-liners ooze out of them like larva oozes out of a volcano. They elevate weighty debates. They stimulate powerful emotional responses. They make online interactions engaging, to the point that it becomes almost impossible not to respond, and the left’s case, to report. Either way, they hook you in and force a reaction.
The political and cultural sparks set off by free-players initiate many more things. The interactions sharpen minds, finetune arguments and influence culture. Information carried by internet voices is challenging the status quo of most topics which affect our daily live. From multiculturalism to history, from fashion to finance, from music to house buying, from feminism to diet, from politicians to vested interests. As users expand their knowledge and skills, their whispers carry through, influencing others as they exercise the power of critical thinking. The flow of information, and the constant human filtering, is teaching people to recognise strawmen, distractions, propaganda, manipulation and cultural engineering. It is also emboldening them to transfer the ideas and arguments they developed online into their real lives. And our lives are becoming richer for it. So, again, I ask why would the corporatists and our governments want to make politics and culture less engaging? To answer, because they don’t want to transfer their power on to the people.
For the first time in history, we, the people, hold the power to create a democracy that has never been seen before. The internet has already proven how power is transferred to its users, the election of Trump has proven it. Is now beginning to break down the stronghold of other institutions and organisations such as universities, which are forced to offer online degrees to remain competitive. Mainstream celebrities are being challenged with ecelebritites, who have larger followings. Newspapers, malls and mainstream music are slowly, but surely, dying and being internet alternatives are flourishing. We’re at the point that no amount of censorship or propaganda or weaponised terminology has the ability to stop this flow — we’re too far in and the tentacles of reason and power decentralisation are now too numerous. Hate-speech laws, censorship, de-platforming, demonization of free-speech is only working in making us more resilient. Hysterical reactions, genocidal messages, menses discharge masks, and the everyone-except-my-virtue- signaling are fascists, have become internet free-play laughter fodder. We have become critics, journalists, commentators, reporters, comedians and philosophers. We are replacing the fake media and all of the slop-suckers attached to them. It is only a matter of time that “the enemy of the people” shall be demoted to historical trash soon to be forgotten. Trolls, through intellectual play, have weaponised humanity.
Trolls are making politics great again, their wit and memes are the new Oscar Wilde play. The fire they ignite steadily grows to illuminate the importance of freedom of speech. We are moving into a new horizon based on reason and democracy and there’s no stopping it.
It is time.
According to Labor, the Liberals, and the Greens, everyone except for Labor, the Liberals and the Greens, are dividing the nation with identity politics tactics. But the truth is, they do use identity politics to gain votes, but have also fine tuned how to concealed their tactic by following the some basic rules.
1. Re-define reality.
2. Infantilise minds.
3. Promote the under-classes as the new super-classes.
4. Dehumanise, demonise and discriminate the majority of Australians.
5. Sectionalise and create quarrelling identities. Divide and conquer.
6. Use the struggle and noise created to further strip citizens of their rights.
7. Shame people who refuse to join the Borg.
8. Camouflage the hypocrisy.
9. Use minorties as human shields for self-protection.
10. Deflect criticism.
11. Create a bogeyman
12. If all modes of control fail then attack and destroy.
Australian politicians have become extremely adept at using identity politics and then covering their tracks with these 12 shallow rules because dividing a culture pays excellent vote dividents. However, in doing so they are also exposing themselves to excellent chances for treason charges by a populist who may rise in the future. I wouldn’t wanna be in their red, sparkly, tranny shoes should that happen…
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
Having a bit of free time, I thought it would be a good idea to stuff some extra wadding into my pillow of political knowledge to help me boost my little blog, so I enrolled in a couple of courses at Macquarie Uni. What could be a better way to broaden one’s thinking and sharpen one’s debate skills, right? Right? Riiight??? Right…
Anyhoo …6pm of day 1 and I’ve already been insulted and reprimanded twice by my totalitarian tutor, who then proceeded to ban me from the class discussion forums, delete my second post and edit-out 3/4 of my original post. How many freshmen can boast such a feat I less than 24 hours and all whilst the other oblivious “Hi I’m Mohammad/Li/Hardik and I’m appreciative to be here!” students were too engrossed in the really the important part of the course – introductions.
So now you’re probably wondering what were these terrifying and traumatic posts which have scarred countless souls? Well, Here is the first:
Annabelle Post 1
I am currently reading the Income & Wealth Inequality in Australia brief and I am taken aback by its biased perspective.
Firstly, I find it somewhat concerning that TIA’s (The Australian Institute) main donor is the Katers (leftist Zionist elites). Surely the Katers would apply some pressure onto TAI to propagandise their perspectives and goals and TAI would oblige to their requests as their survival relies on their donations?
Equally concerning is that the brief bases most of its arguments on an ex-senior vice president of the World Bank and a Georgist! (Georgism: private land ownership is abolished and all land becomes public.) At least with communism you get to keep a bit of land free of charge, but Georgism seems to be a hybrid of the worst of communism and the worst of corporatism. (Imagine if Australia were to be taken over by a foreign force with Georgism laws in place …I shudder!) I find myself unable to trust the opinion of such a person.
Thirdly, TAI has built its argument of the widening gap mostly on the concept that the main reason for the widening gap is that the ATO is not redistributing wealth. It even goes so far as to state the purpose of taxes is wealth distribution! (What about defence and infrastructure!?). TAI ignores to tackle many other reasons for the growing inequality in Australia, some of which being:
1. Widening inequality is an indication of a declining democracy (Chomsky). Since democracy can only exist in nations with average IQs of 90+, the constant influx of non-westerns into Australia is steadily pushing down the national IQ average. An argument can be made that the widening inequality gap is a symptom of multiculturalism.
2. The extremely high migration rates in Australia are increasing work competition. Employers can easily navigate lower salary jobs through such large human resource pools.
3. An economy structured on a two salary system, where women no longer have the choice to manage households are increasing job competition.
4. Exorbitant house prices in Australia is also contributing to the gab and some of the reason are:
A. State governments are not releasing land. I think this is being encouraged by a UN mandate (???)
B. Houses are being snatched by non-Australians citizens (an estimate of 15%+ of houses Australia wide, which would translate to a much higher % in Sydney or Melbourne). Australian citizens are being out-competed.
5. Inadequate infrastructure to handle shifting the workforce further out of the city.
I may list more issues in the coming days. In the meantime I’d love to hear your opinions!
Tot-tut response 1
It is great to see that you have jumped straight into the reading for the week, and engaging in the forum, although you need to keep in mind that if you do this before the lecture, you may have the reading out of context. The first part of your post was thoughtful and to the point. However, your post went a little too far towards the end. It is quite opinionated and given that you don’t know anyone in the course, may give offence. I will be editing the section that I am concerned about.
Please bear in mind that students in the OUA stream in particular, but in the course in general may come from anywhere, and may be in any kind of situation. They may also come from anywhere, including outside Australia. They may be any age up from 13 years old. It would be best if you stick to the themes of the week and a considered reflection on argument of the reading, as your post began. The forums are learning spaces, not free speech spaces.
I hope you understand that I have an obligation to keep the space a welcoming space to all students. I am not discouraging dissenting views, by any means, and it was good to see another student challenge some of your views on the reading, but your post became a little too polemical for comfort – and polemics do not make for positive discussion.
Annabelle Post 2
The only solution I see in this brief is taxes and more taxes and increase benefits. It also has a tendency to concentrate on millionaires over billionaires. Penalising the entrepreneurs is only going to assist the monster-corporations monopolies. The paper treads carefully over this point probably because TAI does not want to displease its primary (billionaire) donor.
There are a lot of cultural and economic ramifications in increasing benefits and taxes, yet not one is explored. For instance, what happens to the dignity of a nation where the State encourages benefits and rewards the non-earners over the earners? Independence is the building block of dignity. Independence also prevents tyrannical states from developing. I find this paper to be, at best, infantile and at worst deceitful.
To answer you, and please excuse my chops, but since I don’t agree with your connections I’ve broken down your questions to better lay out my ideas:
Do you think we can correlate a declining democracy and income inequality with multiculturalism…
Yes. This is easily confirmed by simply looking at a world map and matching government systems to IQ averages.
…when that has formed a fundamental part of Australia’s business, arts, sciences, events and lifestyle?”
Historically speaking, a monoculture has built both Australias (Aboriginal and Western) and Western foundations still dominate Australia. Western subcultures may differ in customs, diet and languages, but they unify in a single culture – the Western Christian culture. Hence, I do not consider Australia to have evolved through multiculturalism.
At present, Australia is beginning to go through a balkanisation of competing cultures, all wanting access to its resources. Elites are motivated by these conflicts as it advantages them. To paraphrase Margaret Mitchel, there is a lot more money to be made from the destruction of a nation than its construction.
Australia has an obligation to accept, based upon international obligations under human rights law and current domestic laws.
I abide by 3 obligations: 1. Myself (or God, if one believes) 2. My family & 3. My country. The obligation to the whole world belongs to the progressives, and I am not a progressive. The elites have everything to gain to demonise my ideology and globalise the world into one economy, as it would serve to expand their wealth and corporate monopolies.
2. Whilst I do see your perspective, I believe woman still have the choice to manage households. This choice appears only to be declining because of an increasing opportunity to participate which in turn contributes to decreasing gender income inequality.
For now families with $200K+ incomes or remote/some rural areas still have this choice, the majority of median income couples have to transfer their children’s ownership to the State and to day-care centres. I don’t think this paper even bothers to explore house prices and it most certainly does not look at the psychological effects of children being raised by institutions.
As for the gender pay gap, I don’t consider this brief is being honest. There are a lot of reasons as to why there are differences in the overall earnings between men and women and I’m not certain that they are negatives.
Tot-tut response 2
You have already made your position clear. I am asking you to consider Netiquette before you post any further. It is not your opinions that are wanted, but a considered reflection of the course material. Since you have not had the opportunity to hear the lecture and apparently haven’t yet read the second reading, you are not doing this. I would appreciate it if you refrained from any further posts on the material in week 1 until you have heard the lecture and had time to think about why the reading has been set.
This message was then followed by a forum closure. On day 3 the forum reappeared and my post 1 was slaughtered and reduced to this:
Annabelle Post 1 (edited by the Tot-tut)
I am currently reading the Income & Wealth Inequality in Australia brief and I am taken aback by its biased perspective.
TAI has built its argument of the widening gap mostly on the concept that the main reason for the widening gap is that the ATO is not redistributing wealth. It  state[s] the purpose of taxes is wealth distribution! (What about defence and infrastructure!?). TAI ignores to tackle many other reasons for the growing inequality in Australia.
Tot-tut removed Post 2
Annabelle’s transparent response
As you are using AusPol forum master privilege to intimidate, blackmail and bully me, I think a little transparency is well in order. I write my response here, where the internet is my oyster and you are unable to censor me.
I had no idea that there were mandatory chronological rules for resources analysis. So I should wait for both lectures, then read all the copious communist toilet worthy recommended reading list before I can utter a single word? But wouldn’t that be enabling inequality to resources access as it would only leave me 3 days of interactive play? Naïve little me thought that the point of a board is to challenge the resources and each other to deepen and clarify understanding and viewpoints. For the record, I made it abundantly clear that I was tackling the article, not the other shallow article, not the extra recommended reading, not the ever so subtle communist indoctrination lecture. As you say, context is important.
I don’t know anyone in the course, nor do I know you, They, in turn, don’t know who I am and nor do you. And that’s fine, the forum is not a popularity pageant, it’s supposed to be an on-topic exchange in ideas and arguments. The internet is transforming everything. Universities going online is only the first step, the next shall be making people the likes of you redundant. It is the ultimate tool for democracy, a point missed by you, your ever so honest place-a-question-mark-at-the-end-of-my-leftist-persuasions-to-cover-myself boss, your institution and all of your other expired reading material.
For the record, I am most certainly am opinionated and controversial. Qualities, which I may add, are prerequisites for political careers. Please see, what’s the name of that other puritanical whore who called all men rapist? Her. Out of curiosity, do you also consider her anti-men woman supremacist stance opinionated and polemic? (Just wondering.)
Through this online open letter, I am confirming to you, as well as to the internet, that I am refusing to censor my on-topic critical thinking just so not to risk offending non-Western students and prepubescents. I am not responsible for other people’s feelings nor am I a baby sitter. If Western reason above passion value offends them, they are free to enrol in universities of their own culture. Australian universities should be tailored for Australians, as we are paying for them. Not that I believe for one instance that such people even care about my post – you are a coward who uses anonymous faces to protect your weak puritanical whore-like opinions and values.
Who are you really kidding, anyway? Fanatical Middle-eastern supremacists adore Adolf Hitler; racist Asians call us the “big-nosed trash of the Pacific;” Negroes are too busy on murder and rape rampages; commie academics twitter on a daily basis calls to genocide the West; and the majority of our prepubescents are Pepe loving neo-Nazis. Get with the programme.
I was completely on track and sticking to the theme of Inequality and was doing it by pointing our ho limited and out-of-date that communist policy brief is, which only serves to impart anti-human values. I provided a few points to demonstrate how shallow and subversive the report is, but I could have easily listed quite a few more. Despite your hysterical, fake-scandalised reaction used to substantiate your offensive and oppressive behaviour towards me.
Learning without free speech (the vehicle which carries critical thinking) is the equivalent of memorising and regurgitating the Quran. How about you go cover yourself in a synthetic tent rag, point your toosh up in an inviting manner and recite the Karl Marx, instead of imposing your communist derived values on to me.
I’ll end this little tete-a-tete with the best quote of the week “There is no attempt to compress anyone into a set of ideas or beliefs. This is very much an open study and you find your own way to conclusions that you frame and shape.” – Prof Geoffrey cast-a-stone-and-hide-the-hand Hawker 26 February 2019 lecture.
Times are changing, S, the internet is morphing into the ultimate frame for our ideas and beliefs. Get ready for a very tight gap.
When I see an elderly woman soliciting feminism my immediate thought is that she is making a retirement fund investment. Only a woman of retirement age could be so oblivious to the cultural swing occurring in the West – puritanical whore-ism is on the way out.
I cannot think of a better way to capture this blossoming cultural shift than with Julie Bishop’s (second) staged resignation. A contaminated old heart waving a lily-white frock, whilst threatening to spill the dirt on her party should they not pass her seat on to another puritanical whore. Powerless, unpopular amongst her peers and discarded by her owner into a final disposable farewell performance, she dictates and threatens tens of senators (our cuckold PM inclusive) with a “do as I say or else.’ And what is Julie Bishop capable of exactly? Will she ssspit regurgitated poison or write yet another strategically timed, make-believe political memoir packed with pedestrian spite? Yawn. Show me the nuclear missiles or get out, has-been Medusa.
Women of strength have always existed and they do not use infantile feminist tactics to gain power. They choose to weaponise their cryptographs and anchor their bloodhounds’ devotion. Indeed, such a woman was Thatcher who weaponised the colour blue, turning it into an anti-comunista flag which decorated her structured suits-armor. Queen Elizabeth I, another powerhouse, weaponised her chaste sexuality to circumvent masculine barriers and to weave herself, her nation and her religion together. She engineered her persona into an iconic symbol that embodied crown, people and culture – power’s holy trinity.
Thatcher turned the Tory blue into an anti-comunista war flag.Those lacking resources are not in a position to bluff – puritanism is a cloak for the corrupt and a noose for the strong. Feminism is a control mechanism for the weak to prevent the strong from rising …but the illusion is shattering. Good riddance to weakness and power be to the rebirth of the West’s Glorianas!
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
We marvel at the enterprising, predatory aptitude of an Australian Firehawk lighting a bush on fire to enhance its chances of a catch. We hold tremendous respect for the cooperative efforts of a pack of wolves hunting down a prey. We applaud the speed of a cheetah, the fierceness of a lion and the measured strength of an owl. We admire power. We admire speed. We admire intelligence. And we do so because we covet superiority.
The left, comprised of the weakest portion of society and thus unable to compete or steal such gifts, redefines the classes to pin groups against each other. It has created an exalted aristocracy for those who cannot compete – the supremacy of the inept class. But it’s a trap. They ensnare the most venal and incompetent sections of our society with fake promises of God-like status and freebies, whilst their independence and maturity are slow-cooked in a crumbling, old cauldron hidden in a dark attic. The Australian quasi-communist Labor party is nothing more than a political underbelly which seeks to gain control through censorship, (inverted) classism, tax enslavement, land confiscation, energy rationing, resources cheap sell-off, divisiveness, moral erosion, blackmail, bribery, threats and treason. Innate inferiority is what motivates Labor to canonise inadequacy and demonise capacity.
This gang of subversive, amoral opportunists is taking advantage of the Liberal’s weak predicament. They care not for ordinary Australian citizens and are more than happy to screw us over for monetary and aberrant carnal rewards. They’ve promoted themselves as Australia’s moral traffic controllers, governing who gets to go, who must stop and who must go to jail. They operate a multi-functioning engineered mechanism patented as liberal moralitywith the added bonus of also functioning as a propagation machine attracting the crafty (who pretend not to understand) and the limited (who have no capacity to understand). The result is a sickening, incestuous, left-fest breeding programme seeking to recruit, en masse, twisted creatures open to extortion controls …all the way down its food chain. Pawn within pawn, bribery within bribery, corruption within corruption. Yet, they have the gall to want to police our morals and speech. Ah!
However, like every other socialist takedown of the West’s cultural fabric, this neo-liberal hierarchical system is doomed. A class of leafhoppers, no matter how much they are bolstered by elites’ stolen money, cannot drive an economy, cannot regulate the abled, cannot drive technology and innovation, cannot capture the imagination and passion of humanity and they most certainly cannot set standards. When I see Labour party members I feel nausea, not respect. When I see a disabled person I feel pity, not admiration. When I am forced to pay a middle eastern man with an intrusion of cloaked women and children trailing behind him, I feel resentment, not benevolence.
For many non-Western cultures, disabilities are viewed as blessings, usually legitimised through religion as having been “touched by God”. This is an excellent cultural mechanism which helps preserve the less fortunate, encourage people to help each other and prevent a culture from spiraling into wanting to eliminate its weakest, devolving into nihilism or purism. However, this is only possible if the incapacitated are viewed as needing help from abled. Gratitude and humility are integral ingredients to prompt charity, help and social cohesion. If the unfortunate is raised above the abled, then pity will devolve into resentment and benevolence into useless eater euthanasia – an evil system which leads to cultural misanthropy and nihilism, the path the Labor party has chosen to force upon Australia for their thirty pieces of silver. Shame on Bill, shame on Labor, shame on ingratitude, shame on willful ignorance and shame on the disloyal.
Enough. Call the elections and let people moon over the Australian Firehawk!
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
For Australia, the 2019 Eurovision Song Contest has become a historical must see, as this is the first time the contestant has been chosen by us, the people. And what a choice we have made! Supremely feminine, incandescent, elegant and gifted all rolled into an exquisite Giotto masterpiece. It’s as though Kate is reawakening the Australian women’s animus.
However, Eurovision has been possessed by a villainous monster – a green-tinged Cyclops. It forcefully beats a primitive hand strung skinned drum, desperately trying to out-compete the magical complexity of a layered melody. Seismic sound waves savagely ripple through the air, reverberating and scattering to deafen all. It means to destroy all that is beautiful and rob Australia of its win. But our Regina Kate Miller-Heidke is not intimidated by the Beast’s putrid breath, our delicate damsel bravely rides forth to challenge Eurovision’s favourite, Netta.
These two women diametrically oppose each other, and, in a convoluted sort of way, represent the classic tale of good vs evil. Kate, who deceptively hides her strength like silk chiffon, vs Netta, who is as refined as coarse potato-carrying hessian cloth and gets the rough job done (carrying potatoes, that is). It’s a battle of female spiritual elevation vs cannibalistic devouring of souls. Immaculate clarity vs in-your-face shocking pinko. Merger & Recovery vs divisiveness. The celestial elevation vs a couple of hooked prongs. Blooming edelweiss vs a desiccated artichoke. Light as a feather maturation vs elephantine oppression. Nightingale vs croak. Serenity vs violence. Do-re-mi vs Boom-bang. Evolving vs blocked pipes. And let’s be honest, beauty vs the grotesque.
Eurovision 2019 has become a girl-powered battleground. It’s a battle we Australians must be prepared to fight to the bitter end. Let’s show the world what we’re made of! Let us be leaders, not a follower! Let’s unite and kick arse! Viva Regina Kate-rina in Gloria!
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving
If someone asked me to devise a strategy to take over a nation my feminine nature would opt for social engineering over a war. After all, subversion will always win over brute force, it’s the tortoise versus the rabbit match – slow, steady and insidious wins the race. And religion would be my choice carrier for my scheme. Why? Because I view religion as a living cultural manifesto – to own a society’s spirit is to own a society.
As a child, I had the ability to entertain myself for hours by studying people – their hair, their clothes, their features, their voices, their smiles and their demeanour. I was not interested in their verbal exchanges, because I instinctively sensed that words can be used to conceal objectives. I preferred to rely on non-verbal interactions. As an adult, I seek mental stimulation by scrutinizing cultures – their environments, their religions, their governments, their languages, their customs and their outlook. To this day, I prefer to rely on social intercourses over dialogues, as I am now certain that words conceal their radar resistant long-range missiles nature.
What superficially gives the impression to be an entertaining pass-time has, in actual fact, developed my understanding of humanity …and myself. It has allowed me to unearth the most important determining factor of a culture – its resources. A culture’s familial system, how it dresses, language, food, its laws, are all shaped and limited by a society’s (access to) resources. Culture is the biological fabric which clasps together a people and their resources, existing to create cohesion for the purpose of group survival.
The ultimate example of culture pushing aggressively outward would be Islam, a religion which evolved from resource impoverish territories lacking in water, fertile soils and usable energy. Survival in such a resource-depleted environment requires misanthropic and authoritarian foundations to enable the prioritisation of the system over its people. Contempt for life, distrust of mankind, strict rules and corporal punishment become the religion’s tools for cultural adherence.
Islam strives to survive through human expansionism. This migratory survival mechanism is driven by polygyny, as it concentrates access to women to the wealthiest minority of men. That is, the class of men who can afford to purchase dowries, maintain concubines and feed their children. It’s the perfect system to maintain maximum offspring survival rate limited only by a man’s wealth and virility. Their unlimited access to women also ensures that this lucre-class remain in their homelands to preserve the territory’s wealth and their breeding women. In effect, Islam function like a beehive factory – the queen remains in her hive, continuously laying eggs surrounded by its honey riches.
In sharp contrast, the queen-bee satiated men, the majority of the pinch-class men live in squalor, with no assets, without the comfort of female bonds and no way to express their heterosexual drive. These drone-bees are purposefully engineered to encourage migration (so to satiate their sexual drive) or to become fighters (to divert their sexual drives). In both instances, they serve to expand Islam’s territory.
This abnormal system has devastating sociological repercussions, including extremely high incidents of mental disorders, anti-social behaviour, emotional distress, paranoia, bullying, domestic violence, inbreeding, incest, low IQs, paedophilia, rape, homosexual behaviour, ownership of women and fanaticism. So to counteract and control these fallouts, Islam embeds a misanthropic religious mindset and implements extreme religious laws. An unnatural radical cultural system requires an unnatural radical rule of law with an indifferent attitude towards life and casualties.
Although China has more recently adopted a corporate Islamic form of expansionism, in lesser recent times it opted to create a culture which pulled aggressively inward through the one-child policy. China’s lack of water, fertile soils and energy resources forced the government to impose a population control mechanism to cope with its high resources demand.
Should some argue that the one-child policy was not religious, I would respond that Buddhism is a religion engineered to subjugate and subdue its people so that extreme policies can be implemented without dissent. In saying this, I can hear my critics dismissing my claim by differentiating religion from government. However, this is a Western limited viewpoint which ignores the fact that in non-western cultures religions and governments are braided into one. This is a good video which explains this concept, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdvBYbNwXaY.
It is also worth noting that the cultural practice of fertility condensation is not a singular phenomenon unique to Mao’s China, varying forms of this practice exist in other Buddhist and resource-scarce countries and are mechanised via polyandry.
Where societies have ample resources, radical expansionism or extreme population condensation lead to extinction. In the first, it would be a detrimental strategy to implement, as access to unlimited resources could not keep in check the population growth. In the latter, it would serve as a progression dampener, as it would limit specialisation which leads to technological progress.
A resources-rich religion which chose to become a conservationist of wealth and a reinforcer of social stability is Christianity. It regulates its population growth via monogamy, controlling its population just enough to avoid a resources quick burn, to allow for familial and financial wealth accumulation and to drive technological advancement.
However, in recent times, Christianity is beginning to show signs of morphing in response to the growing resource competition and restrictions imposed upon it. Harmful religious add-ins include the LGBT+ morality, anti-Christianity atheists, MSM and educational systems’ cultural Marxist philosophy, high divorce rates, single parenting, child sexualisation, formative years childhood displacement, feminism, MGTOWs and many minorities’ religions are all threatening Christianity’s principles. An odd, contradictory mishmash of religions and movements, each striving to survive and out-compete the other, yet joining forces to create a single anti-Christian adversary marketed under the name of Progressivism. This is a collaborated parturition created to dismantle and undermine their biggest competitor – combine and surmount before the divide and conquer. But who engineers the engineers? Unbeknownst to the progressives, it too must transmute into a hybrid religion if it wishes to survive this war. The current compromises it inflicts upon itself must be normalised Christianity absorption is their ultimate goal. Engineering itself into a contracting polyamorous culture to give itself a competitive resource edge may become their price for victory.
The globalists engineering is confiscating and distributing our resources. It uses the climate change agenda to ration our energy resources. It thwarts water harvesting infrastructures to limit our water and food consumption. It restricts our food production by depriving farmers of water, self-propagating seeds and loans in an attempt to limit access to our soil resources. Our biased tax laws and out of control government budgets are draining the country’s and individual’s wealth. Our deindustrialisation makes us dependent on the government and other nations production. Our will and freedoms are being noosed around our necks until we can no longer breath, even to the current point of eradicating the most basic of western man’s right – freedom of speech. The elites are pushing the West into a population of helpless, unskilled, unfulfilled, unloved and unhappy people where refuge is sought through illegal, immoral and culturally detrimental activities. Our culture is being confiscated and then replaced by an engineered abomination that will destroy everything we hold dear. We are being robbed of our souls purely to feed the greed of the elites.
My dear reader, it is not my intent to sow pessimism, I have not chosen this topic to be the bearer of doom. As an optimist, I have chosen to christen my blog with this vitally important post precisely because I want to lay path-maps towards a stable, sustainable and secure future for Australia. The power to redirect Australia is within our grasp. It is time to take control of our resources, territories and laws. It is time to remove the weeds from our rich and beautiful environment. It is time to turn to a new leaf.
Annabelle @ The Art of Flag-waving